Author Topic: Las Vegas Police Investigating Shooting at Mandalay Bay Casino  (Read 33175 times)

This is a good point. It's a well known fact that being gunned down in a crowd of people only induces terror when committed by certain ethnic groups. Victims at the scene reported, "bodily harm, pain, and blood loss, sure, but not necessarily 'terror' tbh'.

terrorism is meant to induce terror, this guy could be mentally ill, which seems to be more and more the--

y'know the more I type this out the less I agree with it

at least his purpose wasn't because someone refused to draw his Danny phantom OC

at least his purpose wasn't because someone refused to draw his Danny phantom OC

that forgetin' chud took fifty shots to kill three people
with a shotgun
at point-blank range

smh get on this guy's level

I know a guy who I remember saying 'im lucky being near the strip'
fuuck that hits back :(

It's not terrorism because it was organized and orchestrated by the left. In case you haven't noticed, they are the ones who decide whether or not it's morally okay to call something terrorism.

It's not terrorism because it was organized and orchestrated by the left. In case you haven't noticed, they are the ones who decide whether or not it's morally okay to call something terrorism.
terrorism or not, people were killed, that's the issue.

at least his purpose wasn't because someone refused to draw his Danny phantom OC
that forgetin' chud took fifty shots to kill three people
with a shotgun
at point-blank range

smh get on this guy's level
Wait what? What was this?

While I do agree with you to an extent, I don't agree with using that as a valid example. With the amount of variables at play, drawing any meaningful conclusion from that is impossible.

At the time of your post, only the name of the shooter and a possible person of interest have been released. In the days after the San Bernardino attack, a clear link between the shooters and a terrorist organization had been established.
That's a fair point, and I agree there are methodological issues with using the search results this early. But I can almost guarantee, based on prior experience, that the verbiage isn't going to change much once this guy's profile is released.

Can you guys stop trying to tell if it was terrorism or not? You will not know for sure until there is more info anyway
people were killed, that's the issue.

that forgetin' chud took fifty shots to kill three people
with a shotgun
at point-blank range

smh get on this guy's level

Wait what? What was this?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PFRArJmAedA

people were killed

Right. That's all it boils off to. Thoughts and prayers lads, thoughts and prayers.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PFRArJmAedA
this guy pisses me off so much because three people died for his petty attempt to become a famous shooter. not to mention his motive was literally autistic

also, has nobody questioned (going with my assumptions that it was a heavy machine gun) how a HMG and 9 other firearms probably passed through hotel security for 3 days.

Can you guys stop trying to tell if it was terrorism or not?
I'm not arguing whether it was terrorism or not. Just pointing out that people's willingness to label an attack as 'terrorism' is dependent on the shooter's ethnicity and religion. If you look up 'Anders Breivik' in a similar time-range, you still predominantly see the word 'shooter' rather than 'terrorism', even though it obviously fulfills every single criteria for a terrorist attack.