It's still youtube's site and they're still the ones pulling the ads off the videos.
But it was still a compromise they had to make otherwise a lot of advertizers were going to be taking their business elsewhere.
Which is still completely loving stupid. I don't understand what kind of thoughts you'd have to have to go through with a business decision like that.
"Hey, lets pull our ads off the biggest internet ad market because a small fraction of our ads are being shown on things we don't like."
ill say it again- youtube isnt the one pulling the ads, its the advertisers, and alot of the videos that have been de-montized were already long before de-monitized, its just that youtube now notifies you about it. and yes, it makes complete sense a company would pull their ads off of a video, if they do not like the message it is converying or just the content inside of the video, they have full rights to demonitize it. remember, if youtube forced them to monitize those videos, well, that would just be completely illegal. equally, youtube cannot remove advertisements either. that wouldn't make sense, why would they remove another companies advertisements? do you think that makes sense? think about it, it doesn't. the "advertiser friendly" guidelines were created as a base for reasons they would- or have- removed monetization on videos.