Author Topic: YouTube Kids is a terrifying stuffhole  (Read 3981 times)



Yesterday I read a pretty great piece by James Bridle about the state of children's videos on YouTube. People are already quite familiar with the stuffton of kids and toy channels on YouTube that pull in billions of views in total and tens of millions of subscribers. But over time there's been plenty of instances where the content from these channels is borderline or outright inappropriate for kids, some of it disturbing in an absurd way. It's a pretty long piece, and the author goes into a bit of a tirade at the end, but these are some of the highlights:

- Almost all of this content, like unboxing videos, surprise eggs and nursery rhymes are packed with these strange title combinations that look like a machine spurt out a bunch of tags to get the most views
- Oh wait, turns out a bunch of these videos are mass produced by thousands of channels with tags packed into the title and description "to capture search results, sidebar placement, and “up next” autoplay rankings." A huge number of these videos, for example the "Finger Family" genre (I have no idea what the forget it is), are created, viewed and commented on by bots. Some channels feature human actors, but the titles still feature the same algorithmically generated keywords.
- As evidenced by channels like Videogyan, you can basically create an infinite number of reconfigurable versions of the same video, over and over again, constantly.
- The side effect of this total automation and randomly generated content is the potential for disaster (kind of like this phone case that you should definitely buy). Nobody intends to create this stuff, it's just spat out by a machine from a list of verbs and pronouns. In the case of YouTube Kids, you end up with incomprehensible stuff like this.
- One channel (Toy Freaks) features videos with a father and two kids where the content borders on abuse and exploitation of children.
- stuff continues to get worse. The content here might be ironic to get a laugh out of some, but it's important to keep in mind videos like these are made for and viewed by children who can't parse between a dark knockoff and the official brand. Honestly it becomes harder to discern the parodies from the "genuinely"-produced content.
- To top it off, the piece ends with a video called "BURIED ALIVE Outdoor Playground Finger Family Song Nursery Rhymes Animation Education Learning Video" that basically features all the elements previously discussed (full automation, word salad, blatant violence) and is no different from a stuffton of other content churned out daily by thousands of channels. The author mentions in passing the presence of even more loveually explicit and violent "children's" videos.

A ton of people have addressed a lot of the stuffty content on YouTube Kids and how sick they are of seeing Spiderman-Elsa pregnancy videos proliferate the site, but this to me feels like exploitation of children. More often than not, it's just automatically created nightmare fuel that isn't even made by human producers, just brought into existence out of nowhere. Content is being produced that would give me nightmares at 7 years old for profit, and Google/YouTube is absolutely complicit in this due to the lack of action.

TL;DR - Kids' videos on YouTube are produced at an increasingly case, most often automated with little to no human input, results in dark, nightmarish content, questions of abuse and exploitation of children surface, Google and YouTube are doing hardly anything to stop it.


"We must make YouTube safe for children by demonetizing videos that children don't watch and turn a blind eye to all the videos directly marketed to children."

You're definitely overstating the power some of these videos have. I'm watching the last video you linked right now, and so far, the violence I've seen is pretty tame considering some of the children's cartoons I've seen. You realize that the opening to the Powerpuff Girls has Buttercup kicking Him in the face, with blood and teeth coming out of his mouth, right? And don't even get me started with regards to Ren and Stimpy. The most I'm seeing out of this is absolutely incoherent, random crap that, even to kids, makes no sense.

I don't even have to talk about how dangerous the "content" in these videos is because the quality of animation and sound is so bad that a kid would start crying almost immediately. The sound the kids make when they're happy, for example (that giggling), is processed so poorly that it comes out as sharp and irritating on even my piece of stuff five-year-old computer speakers. And they play it several times in a row. No kid could sit through that. They start crying if someone just shouts with joy. That's all it takes, so to think that kids would ask their parents to let them watch this for longer than five seconds seems questionable to me.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 10:51:54 PM by Tactical Nuke »

I like the episode of Peppa Pig where she kills venom with a sawblade

"We must make YouTube safe for children by demonetizing videos that children don't watch and turn a blind eye to all the videos directly marketed to children."
this

I don't know if terrifying is the word I would use. Mind numbingly handicapped sure. Really sucks because kids deserve better then this.

That's not why they're demonitizing videos at all.

these videos are made with buzzwords so children mindlessly click the video and give views, and views = $$$

the people who upload these know how to exploit the system so it appears on youtube kids.

some are weird but innocent and nature, but some are extremely loveual and inappropriate.

youtube needs to learn how to properly monitor youtube kids or get rid of it all together

Kids should not be on the internet. It's irresponsible.

Or they should at least be monitored by their parents. But nah, they just let the internet babysit their kids nowadays.



why not just take the ipad away and make the kids go outside so they dont deal with this kind of garbage content.

They're making these videos for money and ad revenue because they're using family friendly brands