Poll

Are you scared of death?

Yes
10 (15.6%)
No
23 (35.9%)
Sort of
31 (48.4%)

Total Members Voted: 64

Author Topic: Are you scared of death? / what do you think comes after death?  (Read 9006 times)

Yeah, that's not how the burden of proof works, buddy. You need to prove that cessation exists; you don't need to prove that cessation doesn't exist. In the absence of any other evidence, "afterlife" is the default state.
been hitting the canned air, pal?

been hitting the canned air, pal?

it's a short but fleeting high

short and fleeting are synonyms brother

short and fleeting are synonyms brother

too much canned air

anyone who champions nihilism is a friend

Yeah, that's not how the burden of proof works, buddy. You need to prove that cessation exists; you don't need to prove that cessation doesn't exist. In the absence of any other evidence, "afterlife" is the default state.

huh

Yeah, that's not how the burden of proof works, buddy. You need to prove that cessation exists; you don't need to prove that cessation doesn't exist. In the absence of any other evidence, "afterlife" is the default state.
That makes absolutely no sense. Imagine if I claimed that, because we don't have evidence of a teapot orbiting Mars, there most likely isn't a teapot orbiting Mars. Then you replied with this:
"You need to prove that lack of a teapot orbiting Mars exists; you don't need to prove that lack of a teapot orbiting Mars doesn't exist. In the absence of any other evidence, 'a teapot orbiting mars' is the default state."

Clearly that's nonsense; nonexistence (or the null hypothesis) is the default state for anything when there's no evidence to the contrary.

You can believe in an afterlife if you want - I won't stop you - but such a conclusion certainly isn't logical.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 07:38:35 PM by TristanLuigi »

In the absence of any other evidence, "afterlife" is the default state.
What are you on about lol

You can believe in an afterlife if you want - I won't stop you - but such a conclusion certainly isn't logical.

enlightened atheist

Imagine if I claimed that, because we don't have evidence of a teapot orbiting Mars, there most likely isn't a teapot orbiting Mars

except this is a definitively physically observable issue which already throws the brown townogy out the window

except this is a definitively physically observable issue which already throws the brown townogy out the window
okay, a teapot orbiting a random planet in the andromeda galaxy, which we cannot observe for the foreseeable future
are you happy now? it doesn't affect the brown townogy at all, you're just being pedantic for the sake of being pedantic
« Last Edit: November 09, 2017, 08:49:02 PM by TristanLuigi »

hey guys i have a great idea let's talk about the afterlife on a lego forum what could go wrong

hell yes im scared of death

hey guys i have a great idea let's talk about the afterlife on a lego forum what could go wrong
I mean, it doesn't have to be insults, tristan made a fair enough point in the first half of his original post

you're just being pedantic for the sake of being pedantic

says the one claiming to be certain of something incomprehensible and impossible to observe or deduce either way