Author Topic: [NEWS]Cards Against Humanity buys land on U.S./Mexico border to block wall  (Read 7051 times)


saw that
but the gov could build around their plot of land..

an actual problem with the wall concept is that tons of that border land is indian reservations and mountains. and that's best[sic] case, assuming they can buy every piece of territory along the border.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2017, 03:23:44 AM by Nonnel »

< The wall was a plot to sell land

4D Chess, libcucks got played like a loving fiddle once again

the land will be brought back for the great wall project

Why do people have to ruin good things with their virtue signalling bullstuff

cue argument over whether or not a wall is a good thing in 3...2...

I think the wall will be a wall alright. I don't know enough about walls to make proper judgement. Will it do it's job? Well, you can pass through concrete efficiently. Can you go over it? Probably.

If we don't need it, it sure isn't my job to tell the president of the united states that. If it isn't going to be made, I hope the resources spent talking about it is used to do something about illegal immigrancy.

cue argument over whether or not a wall is a good thing in 3...2...

I'm talking about CAH, not the wall

Eminent Domain and this time Annoying Orange is in the right if he uses this claim.

Why do people have to ruin good things with their virtue signalling bullstuff

lmao


< building a wall in 2017
we have to build a dome.

Eminent Domain and this time Annoying Orange is in the right if he uses this claim.


>Thinks seizing private property is communist
>Wants government to use eminent domain

Eminent domain cases are possibly strongest on the border, but the landowners can fight it in court. Hundreds of land-owners have sued the US government over border agents erecting fences on their land. Some win. CaH wouldn't spend the money to launch a full-on lawsuit (probably) but the point is moot because there will be no border wall anyway.

>Thinks seizing private property is communist
>Wants government to use eminent domain
matthew being backwards is nothing new