a windows 95 emulator i found

[SwiftHyena2593]

its ok i guess.
its an emulator for windows 95. its best used with your browser's priority set to high. sometimes it freezes and you have to reload the page.
heres the link:
https://win95.ajf.me/
heres some of my pics from using it



it reminds me of my first pc that i got when i was little. dont know how i remember it but it was a gateway with windows 2000.
/discuss

[Ad Bot]

[Drydess]

laughed at the mspaint

[K3k0m@n]

well windows 95 emulators have been around for so many years but this is the first time ive ever seen it in a browser which is very impressive

[Mr Queeba]

i've known about this for a while, it's pretty neat.

[Fire Vine]

noice


sure it wont be as fast or as accurate as using virtualbox or vmware to emulate it but this dosnt seem too bad

[BlocklandBlockoCity]

why are the pixels so choppy

[Aide33]

why are the pixels so choppy

scaling

[joe411]

it's windows 95 running in doxbox running in emscriptem


cool...?

[maxymax13]

didn't you say that weren't gonna post that image again?
but it's cool. certainly not better than virtualbox or any other vm software but hey, it's in a browser.
browser things are always cool

[TheBlokoMan]

Just drop $100 on a 486 machine it's not that hard to get into old pcs

if you want to run newer software upgrade to win98 and install kernelEX.

[two and a half limericks]

bzzzzzzzttttttttt bolster ple-

[MoleManFromMiddleMars]

didn't you say that weren't gonna post that image again?
but it's cool. certainly not better than virtualbox or any other vm software but hey, it's in a browser.
browser things are always cool

To be fair, it's no where near as bad as the real thing.

[Foopster]

far superior version of windows  http://www.windows93.net/

[SwiftHyena2593]

far superior version of windows  http://www.windows93.net/

this one is actually pretty cool.

[Super Suit 12]

far superior version of windows  http://www.windows93.net/

can't get to this thread otherwise I'd post from it
seems to not support HTTPS, could be wrong...