The Day the Snowflakes Attacked - A YouTube Tragedy

[torin²]

please tell me youre not using the term "snowflakes" unironically

[Ad Bot]

[Adrenaline]

guys we cant win this debate since master matthew is genetically supreme to all of us

yea thats another way to call someone inbred

please tell me youre not using the term "snowflakes" unironically

bad news

[PhantOS]

So it's okay to curse on TV but not the internet?

You're absolutely right, Master Matthew! I see the way now! We should allow people to curse on cartoon network, PBS, and the history channel! Who needs carefully planned timeslots targeted to an adult audience when you can just go the master matthew way! Here at master matthew entertainment industries, no business decision is a bad business decision! here's your free money, Sesame Street-Drugs

Oh no, the internet is special.

it literally is. it's the only completely unguided medium of entertainment in existence. When you watch tv you watch what executives plan for you. On the internet you can access literally anything. This is why COKE doesn't want to monetize Idubbbz' monday friend extravaganza.

Stop acting like this is all an "entitled attack". This is a double standard that is costing people jobs. But I can understand that you don't care so long as everyone is jobless and poor, like real communism.

What you propose is literally for independent companies to associate themselves with vulgar content, and now you accuse me of wanting to cost people jobs? If your kids toy brand baby food ad appears on a "why i hate all black mondays" video then your entire company might go bankrupt overnight.

You're literally the most communist entity in this entire thread. You're literally proposing that youtube welfare be handed out to everyone by companies or else they are liberal scum. See its normal to say "the government should support everyone" but what you're saying is the most anti-communist thing in existence- "private companies should be forced to pay all content creators"

[Master Matthew²]

ok, but how will it earn money? think about the costs of setting up alll of the servers, the website, staff, etc. how can they profit off of a free video uploading service???

No large servers.
videos are supply and demand through a P2P system.
Encrypted of course, as to not have dipstuffs altering other people's videos.
People who participate in the P2P system get rewards, like animated images in comments.

[Adrenaline]

No large servers.
videos are supply and demand through a P2P system.
Encrypted of course, as to not have dipstuffs altering other people's videos.
People who participate in the P2P system get rewards, like animated images in comments.

do you know how the internet works

[e-maxx]

it's almost like making a career out of having videos monetized by a third party private company was never a good idea to begin with

who would of thunk it

No large servers.
videos are supply and demand through a P2P system.
Encrypted of course, as to not have dipstuffs altering other people's videos.
People who participate in the P2P system get rewards, like animated images in comments.

brother what

[PhantOS]

No large servers.
videos are supply and demand through a P2P system.
Encrypted of course, as to not have dipstuffs altering other people's videos.
People who participate in the P2P system get rewards, like animated images in comments.

Oh so vid.me, the same website that went bankrupt after 3 years of hosting mediocre libertarian opinion videos. Niiice

anyways your system has no source of income anywhere, unless you propose every user pays a small fee. if that happens then not only will nobody use the service because its not free, but videos like "most satisfying video in the world" which garner millions of views will dominate the system, because making anything else is not worth the time.

[Master Matthew²]

You're absolutely right, Master Matthew! I see the way now! We should allow people to curse on cartoon network, PBS, and the history channel! Who needs carefully planned timeslots targeted to an adult audience when you can just go the master matthew way! Here at master matthew entertainment industries, no business decision is a bad business decision! here's your free money, Sesame Street-Drugs

Yeah, but imagine if every TV SLOT was kid friendly, and anything else was actively discouraged.

it literally is. it's the only completely unguided medium of entertainment in existence. When you watch tv you watch what executives plan for you. On the internet you can access literally anything. This is why COKE doesn't want to monetize Idubbbz' monday friend extravaganza.
What you propose is literally for independent companies to associate themselves with vulgar content, and now you accuse me of wanting to cost people jobs? If your kids toy brand baby food ad appears on a "why i hate all black mondays" video then your entire company might go bankrupt overnight.

That's handicapped propaganda MSM fed these companies to panic.
People know better than to believe these companies sat down and selected these awful videos to be advertised.
And even if that bullstuff was true, I'm not talking about Idubbbs or whichever ass you pulled that scapegoat video title from.
I'm talking about average youtubers getting forgetED OVER because they aren't kid friendly.

If the system doesn't work, change the system, don't loving ban people for not conforming to a loving tiny market of people.

You're literally the most communist entity in this entire thread. You're literally proposing that youtube welfare be handed out to everyone by companies or else they are liberal scum. Get out of here

They're proposing NO ALTERNATIVE.
"MAKE KID FRIENDLY CONTENT, OR YOU DON'T GET PAID"
That's IT.

[Mad Hops Disease]

https://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=310115.msg9536821#msg9536821
if you ever wonder why matthew is so smart just read this

[Master Matthew²]

Oh so vid.me, the same website that went bankrupt after 3 years of hosting mediocre libertarian opinion videos. Niiice

anyways your system has no source of income anywhere, unless you propose every user pays a small fee.

if that happens then not only will nobody use the service because its not free, but videos like "most satisfying video in the world" which garner millions of views will dominate the system, because making anything else is not worth the time.

seriously though, a small fee system could work, as an OPTIONAL part.
and as I said with the P2P, barely any servers would be needed at all. why would making anything else "not be worth to time" in a system in which people AREN'T forced to conform to ass backward "Kid Friendly Content" bullstuff?

[ChappersTeddy]

The part where I was born with a Higher IQ, The part where I was genetically enabled to make better decisions at a younger age, I was able to live smarter, be smarter, instead of living a life of snapchat filters and tumblr posts.

[PhantOS]

Yeah, but imagine if every TV SLOT was kid friendly, and anything else was actively discouraged.

tv networks aren't products. comedy central doesn't care if they have shows that have cursing on it because that brings in more views. their ads are specifically chosen to an adult audience.

That's handicapped propaganda MSM fed these companies to panic.

It's actually the public relations experts who aformentioned receive a six figure salary to make sure that their viewership and target audience is constant. lol you're loving autistic

People know better than to believe these companies sat down and selected these awful videos to be advertised.
And even if that bullstuff was true, I'm not talking about Idubbbs or whichever ass you pulled that scapegoat video title from.
I'm talking about average youtubers getting forgetED OVER because they aren't kid friendly.

Companies sat down and selected popular and kid friendly videos to be monetized. They dont monetize unpopular videos, they dont monetize vulgar videos. They want their product to be associated with a mild video. Who gives a stuff if average youtubers lose 10cents every day because their average-ass youtube video makes no money? The companies have all the money, they decide what they do with it because it's their market, not the average youtuber's. It doesn't even matter if its kid friendly or not, its their money, not yours. Stop forcing other people to pay for content that they dont want to pay for, forgeto.

The stock market works the same way. You suck up to investors and they give you money, or you dont and then you make no money and your business fades off the surface of the earth. Money is competitive, nobody's going to give it away for the hell of it.

If the system doesn't work, change the system, don't loving ban people for not conforming to a loving tiny market of people.
They're proposing NO ALTERNATIVE.
"MAKE KID FRIENDLY CONTENT, OR YOU DON'T GET PAID"
That's IT.

If the system didn't work they'd be monetizing stuffty vulgar videos. Since they aren't and they're making tons of non-image flawed money, the system is working for them. the only people it's not working for is the people who make stuffty vulgar videos. They need to change their system in order to conform with the viewers AND the money.

[K3k0m@n]

No large servers.
videos are supply and demand through a P2P system.
Encrypted of course, as to not have dipstuffs altering other people's videos.
People who participate in the P2P system get rewards, like animated images in comments.

let me suggest: stop. moaning about stuff that you obviously have no idea how to solve. moaning isn't gonna do stuff if you have no ideas on how to actually fix the issue and this 'idea' of a loving 'p2p system' really shows how much you know about how the internet actually works. there's a forgetin reason why this hasn't happened already.

[Gytyyhgfffff]

i could see a peer to peer video sharing system working for a small number of videos but it would quickly get unmanageable due to video file sizes and an inevitable lack of users using the p2p system

[PhantOS]

and as I said with the P2P, barely any servers would be needed at all. why would making anything else "not be worth to time" in a system in which people AREN'T forced to conform to ass backward "Kid Friendly Content" bullstuff?

You clearly dont understand how p2p works. If youtube were built how you suggested, streaming videos would be an absolute nightmare. If your 'demand' is really weird conservative opinion videos and nothing else (thats definitely yours) then you'd probably p2p with paul joseph watson, who'd have to buy about 20 separate servers just to make sure you can actually connect without downloading the video at 1kb per minute. Not only that, but if the p2p is down, that video would be entirely unavailable. Also P2P requires hundreds more dollars in management and threading of networks just to give every viewer a good experience, and requires billions of dollars for each channel to operate at the capacity it does on regular youtube servers.

You're de-centralizing video hosting which means that each individual channel would have to dish out their own money, and not only that, but because of how arbitrary everything would be, the total cost for all channels combined would probably be hundreds of billions of dollars more than youtube's actual net worth.

All videos would basically be demonetized anyways because the cost to keep up the server hosting the videos would far exceed what people would actually pay to connect to it. And most people wouldn't pay at all, meaning your entire money-contingent system is extremely unpredictable.