But he's right.
You're basically calling his response a strawman for not taking the bait on yours.
my question wasn't a stawman or bait? i was asking a direct question towards tactical nuke, not rhetorical, not sarcast, a direct question. strawman fallacy deals with arguments. all a strawman is is basically rewriting someone else's expression falsely to aid your rebuttal, but you can't strawman an expression that doesn't exist, ie tactical nuke's untold answer.
a question is an expression and can be strawmanned/changed, but a question cannot be a strawman unless its rhetorical or sarcastic. since i already explained that it wasn't, implying that it is is a strawman.
ergo master matthew is strawmanning my question in order to attack me, while i am just posing a regular question to tactical nuke. there's no bait, the question isn't loaded, you and master matthew just have absolutely no way of contributing to the discussion so you're coming after me