[news] Protesters Rally Outside Philadelphia Starbucks After Arrests Of 2 Black

[King Tøny]

So what about the CEO of Starbucks saying it was wrong?  

Corporations will loving say anything to not lose stockholders.

What about the CEO of walmart saying that their corporation is a loving and caring community?  

They shouldn't have been asked to leave in the first place.

It is the individual's store policy to not have loiters unless they buy something.

They were asked to buy something or leave.

They refused to buy.

They were asked to leave.

They refused to leave.

10-30 minutes pass, still refusing to leave.

The police were called.

The police asked them to leave.

They refused to leave.

The police asked them to leave.

They refused to leave.

The police asked them to leave.

They refused to leave.

The police arrested and removed them by force for refusing to leave 3 times.

"IT MUST BE WACISM"

[Ad Bot]

[Deus Ex]

The two black dudes were literally just standing there waiting for a friend when the store manager called the police because she thought they were trespassing

That's blatant discrimination, not just "MUH RACISM"

That's not what happened at all you loving manlet

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-philadelphia-starbucks/starbucks-ceo-says-arrests-of-two-black-men-reprehensible-idUSKBN1HN2AL

So what about the CEO of Starbucks saying it was wrong?  

They shouldn't have been asked to leave in the first place.

wow, the CEO is trying to prevent monetary loss by placating to a bunch of race baiting bitchcunts? What a loving shock. It's like everyone is cucked nowadays and immediately bends the knee when they're company is accused of doing literally anything by these idiots

The employees at the store had every right to tell them to leave if they weren't buying anything. Starbucks isn't some public space, it's a private business. While individual stores have different policies about loitering, this one obviously doesn't allow it, so when they were asked to leave, they could have either bought something or left. This is handicapped. This shouldn't even be a discussion, but people like you and Leisurefriend over here slurp down race warrior jizzum like there's no tomorrow.

[King Tøny]

This was not a loving 1950s sit in. They were not forced to leave for being black.

The liberal left are literally looking for loving anything to protest.

[thegoodperry]

its ironic because i chill at starbucks like 3 days a week for 7 hours those days and i never buy anything and they let me use their wifi and bathroom freely...

like half of the people here loiter like 90% of the time but if someone looks shady they'll usually ask them to leave... idk why but i guess you aren't allowed to loiter unless you look suspicious. its probably because a lot of homeless people try to use the bathroom a lot

[King Tøny]

its ironic because i chill at starbucks like 3 days a week for 7 hours those days and i never buy anything and they let me use their wifi and bathroom freely...

It is the individual's store policy to not have loiters unless they buy something.

Different store different rules.

Which is why people think it's "wacism"

BUT BUT BUT THE NEW JERSEY STARBUCKS LETS ME USE THE BATHROOM FOR FREE!

BUT BUT BUT THE NEW YORK STARBUCKS LETS ME USE THE BATHROOM FOR FREE!

[SWAT One]

its ironic because i chill at starbucks like 3 days a week for 7 hours those days and i never buy anything and they let me use their wifi and bathroom freely...

like half of the people here loiter like 90% of the time but if someone looks shady they'll usually ask them to leave... idk why but i guess you aren't allowed to loiter unless you look suspicious. its probably because a lot of homeless people try to use the bathroom a lot

The Starbucks in my hometown gets heroin addicts and stuff in their bathroom, so hey keep it locked. Happens very week from what the employees told me. So yeah, people definitely abuse it. Thing is, my hometown isn't that crime-ridden, really, especially not in that part of it.

[thegoodperry]

Different store different rules.

Which is why people think it's "wacism"

BUT BUT BUT THE NEW JERSEY STARBUCKS LETS ME USE THE BATHROOM FOR FREE!

BUT BUT BUT THE NEW YORK STARBUCKS LETS ME USE THE BATHROOM FOR FREE!

or maybe all the stores have the same policy its just that the workers only ask 'suspicious' individuals to leave which is basically open to bias

im sure a white man in a suit and a black guy in a hoodie who both didnt purchase anything will be treated differently when trying to access the bathroom

[LeisureSuit912]

That's not what happened at all you loving manlet

No problem Uncle Tom, but

They shouldn't have been asked to leave in the first place.

[King Tøny]

If it's their policy to only allow customers then yes they should be asked to leave as they have no business there.

The starbucks building is a private building.

Yes it is open for everyone but it is not a public place like a loving park.

[cblock360]

Black people shouldn't be in a Starbucks, regardless.

[King Tøny]

Entitled people don't realize that stores are not public places.

[thegoodperry]

Black people shouldn't be in a Starbucks, regardless.

this is true, its definitely a dangerous place for a black man

[King Tøny]

https://www.quora.com/Is-a-Starbucks-store-a-public-space-If-not-is-an-amusement-park-a-public-space-Why

[cblock360]

Entitled people don't realize that stores are not public places.

This is why we need segregation again.

[King Tøny]

This is why we need segregation again.

Already happening.

Colleges want black only safe spaces where white people can't go to.

Kinda funny how we want segregation again but now it's reversed.