Author Topic: bill cosby found guilty on all counts  (Read 11171 times)

You can't unfairly claim the justice system is flawed for 1 case out of millions.

Unless you can prove those millions or they don't exist.

1 case is insignificant.

Like I'm sure there are women out there criticising men for using the hashtag which is bad, but overall I think there has been a net positive effect of the whole movement

You provided 1 example.

That means every other case has not happened unless you can prove it exists.

And 1 proven case is insignificant to the general populous.

Do you see why your argument is getting contradictory?
It doesn't matter if other cases have not happened. One man was misjudged, therefore the system is flawed. Something cannot be 99.9999% and 100% at the same time, that is mathematically impossible. The system is not 100% perfect, therefore it is flawed.

And 1 proven case is significant. 1 unproven case is not significant. You havent proven your case, therefore your argument is not true or significant

It doesn't matter if other cases have not happened. One man was misjudged, therefore the system is flawed.

Mistakes happen.

You cannot expect perfection from mere mortals.

You can't unfairly claim the justice system is flawed for 1 case out of millions.

Unless you can prove those millions or they don't exist.

1 case is insignificant.
1/x can only be equal to 1 or less than 1. even with 1 proven case, you've already proved a constant true: that the system is not perfect. therefore it is flawed. the amount of cases done correctly does not matter anymore

Mistakes happen.

You cannot expect perfection from mere mortals.
Yes. The system is flawed. That statement is true.

I have actually seen women criticizing men for using the #MenToo hashtag, saying that men are trying to "hijack" the #MeToo movement or whatever.  It's pretty disgusting.

There, I just proved it happened.

Got a secondary eye witness.

There, I just proved it happened.

Got a secondary eye witness.
Eye witnesses do not matter. You have not proved it happened. You must post a primary source of a woman getting angry at a man using #meToo in order to prove it happened

Eye witnesses do not matter.

Tell that to victims in loveual assault cases that only have eye witnesses as proof.

Guess they do not matter.

Tell that to victims in loveual assault cases that only have eye witnesses as proof.

Guess they do not matter.
They don't. Only Andrea Constand matters in that case, she's the only one who has solid proof of being at cosby's residence and being drugged.

says you, the skeptic
Says the idea that our court system is based on.
"Innocent until proven Guilty"
honestly it sounds to me like you're just trying to own liberals
When did saying that we should treat course-cases indiscriminately, not giving any type of case special treatment, become an "Pwning teh librals" perspective?


Tony the system IS flawed.
Perfection is impossible.

Eye witnesses do not matter.
wtf is happening.

They don't. Only Andrea Constand matters in that case, she's the only one who has solid proof of being at cosby's residence and being drugged.

Didn't cosby plea guilty or was he found guilty?

Says the idea that our court system is based on.
"Innocent until proven Guilty"
what the forget kind of point are you getting at
When did saying that we should treat course-cases indiscriminately, not giving any type of case special treatment, become an "Pwning teh librals" perspective?
im not gonna argue with this stuff lmaooo

Didn't cosby plea guilty or was he found guilty?
Cosby pleaded not guilty. He was found guilty. Both him and Andrea say that they met at cosby's residence, both admit that Cosby gave a 'pill' to andrea and later had love with her. Andrea says the pill impaired her therefore it was non-consentual

the nail in the coffin was the fact that cosby had purchased Methaqualone frequently and especially the night before the loveual assault took place.

this argument is giving me depression