Author Topic: TIME Magazine is fake news  (Read 5491 times)

TIME Magazine cover depicting a crying girl supposedly separated from her family was, of course, out of context and used to push a false narrative. As expected of mainstream media they are incapable of being impartial and pushing facts. Sources below.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5869829/Father-two-year-old-face-child-separation-crCIA-speaks-out.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-photo/father-says-little-honduran-girl-on-time-cover-was-not-taken-from-mother-idUSKBN1JI07W?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44578339

obviously this means children never were separated from their parents in this first place

obviously this means children never were separated from their parents in this first place

Obviously that's not what I loving said

well fellow liberals, pack it up, the outrage is over they figured it out

Obviously that's not what I loving said
well fellow liberals, pack it up, the outrage is over they figured it out
autism unleashed

hmm. and you know what? i dont think Annoying Orange was even looking at the kid like on the cover! this whole thing is a sham!

total outrage. girls dont exist, onm the internet

i think some of the right leaning forumers are the republican equal of the sjw. while both have very different political opinions, at the core they are very similar. may the mczealots and the tonys unite

ok i wont trust time magazine anymore since they made a minor mistake on the cover

Literally none of your opinions are worth stuff because your only goal is dismissal instead of any intellectual engagement

Literally none of your opinions are worth stuff because your only goal is dismissal instead of any intellectual engagement
have u read your own posts


i cant believe that people wouldnt want to engage me, the angry guy who cant stop being mad

have u read your own posts

I'm not getting sidetracked by any of your ad hominem nonsense. I'll respond to actual discussion, not this drivel

I'm not getting sidetracked by any of your ad hominem nonsense. I'll respond to actual discussion, not this drivel
Ok