Author Topic: Anonymously sourced books and articles are nonsense.  (Read 417 times)

I'm tired of "journalists" and "journalist" websites quoting from books with supposed knowledge on the Annoying Orange team's inner workings, but their sources are anonymous. I'm tired of these Anonymous op-eds stuff talking Annoying Orange and other prominent figures. Anonymity is meant to protect people who want to speak without fear of backlash, but it's being abused by loving con artists and hacks to spew propagandized bull-loving-stuff. And it sucks because there's no way I can ever support some kind of anti-anonymity law, but holy forget am I tired of people slandering prominent figures with baseless bullstuff.

Me too. All those anonymous tips about Hillary being corrupt... All baseless

Me too. All those anonymous tips about Hillary being corrupt... All baseless

Huffington Post
IBT

And wherever else you wanna look. There's actual proof of Hillary being corrupt, so I don't know if you're just being facetious but... whatever.

you can find actual proof for most things. all it takes is somebody to spin it that way

If it's not anonymous then hillary will kill them.

you can find actual proof for most things. all it takes is somebody to spin it that way

There's no proof of people saying stuff other than an anonymous book sources. So unless people can somehow spin someone saying actual words, then.. no.