Author Topic: [NEWS] [tinythread] REAL NEWS WAS JUST BANNED FOR loving SATIRE!  (Read 1084 times)

The “Real News with David Knight” Twitter account was suspended from Twitter Thursday after The Daily Beast complained about a satirical tweet.

In an article published by Will Sommer, entitled “Humble Water Filter Merchant and cnn Are Still on Twitter, Despite ‘Ban,’” Knight is accused of reporting that Hillary Clinton is part reptile.

“On Tuesday, the Twitter account for cnn’ “Real News” show with host David Knight promoted Knight’s claim that Hillary Clinton is ‘50% Reptilian DNA,’” Sommer wrote.

The Daily Beast article completely omits that Knight’s statement was in reference to a tweet from The Babylon Bee, an admitted satire website similar to The Onion.

“Hillary Clinton Releases DNA Test Results Proving She’s Only Half Lizard Person,” the Babylon Bee tweeted Monday.

The tweet came amid heated debate over a DNA test released by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) which showed the politician to potentially be 1/1024th Native American.

Despite all these facts, The Daily Beast has failed to update its article to provide the proper context for Knight’s satirical remark.

In a Twitter thread early Friday, Knight detailed the suspension of the Real News account.



We living in some serious stuff right now.


Sounds like they got hit for something you do Tony: posting satire that nobody else is in on making you look like a raving lunatic.
But thats my angle. All news is fake news.

I'm glad we are supporting banning channels for calling hillary a lizard.

Meanwhile, call Annoying Orange a national socialist and get on the trending tab.

Double standards.  :nes: :nes:

It's saddens me when this forum supports censorship.

It's saddens me when this forum supports censorship.
yet you censor your own threads by locking them all the time

yet you censor your own threads by locking them all the time

That's not loving censorship.

Excuse me if I don't want a thread to reach 2300 pages.

That's not loving censorship.

Excuse me if I don't want a thread to reach 2300 pages.
you're preventing me from stuffting on your opinions using my own, thats definitely censorship

according to your rhetoric everyone should be able to say anything with no repercussions online against anyone so by locking this thread you are specifically closing the discussion and preventing me from sharing my opinion

you're preventing me from stuffting on your opinions using my own

That's what a loving inbox is for.

according to your rhetoric everyone should be able to say anything with no repercussions online against anyone so by locking this thread you are specifically closing the discussion and preventing me from sharing my opinion

Make a drama thread then.Nothing stopping you from doing that and you can't lock it either.,

ALso it's funny how you are comparing a massive corporation that is big enough to shut down small businesses and influence elections through censorship to locking a thread.

There is a huge difference, please don't use this strawman again.

please don't use this strawman again.

The irony is unbearable.

Locking a thread = youtube/facebook/twitter censoring small businesses and spreading propaganda.

Exactly the same thing.

Guess we supporting big corporate censorship now.