Poll

What will be your breaking point?

Favorite YouTuber gets banned.
2 (10.5%)
Public Official/Political Party Affiliated Person gets banned from twitter (Examples: Ted Cruz, President Annoying Orange, Vermin Supreme, etc...)
2 (10.5%)
Romhacks/Game Mods get purged
4 (21.1%)
Nothing.
6 (31.6%)
Other
5 (26.3%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: The Censorship Megathread  (Read 3072 times)

So get this ad hominem bullstuff out of here.

Youtube is going around actively censoring people, there is loving proof on this. Someone already tested their algorithms and they do in fact ban you for political speech that goes against what they believe.

if they cencor furries then i will shhot up scool

So get this ad hominem bullstuff out of here.

Youtube is going around actively censoring people, there is loving proof on this. Someone already tested their algorithms and they do in fact ban you for political speech that goes against what they believe.
I doubt there are algorithms that do it automatically, these bans seems manual for the time being. It still is bad that they are even doing this.

I don't care until twitter starts banning furries

if they cencor furries then i will shhot up scool

Oh don't loving worry they won't.

Some loving furry made videos of himself beating up a cat to death, yes the cat loving died. Not only wasn't it taken down but it was loving monetized too.

Eventually the video got taken down but his loving channel wasn't banned for it.

« Last Edit: December 28, 2018, 03:09:42 PM by King Tøny »

I doubt there are algorithms that do it automatically, these bans seems manual for the time being. It still is bad that they are even doing this.

People are getting banned just for private videos with 0 views.

youtube automates just about everything. They have always been pretty awful about this kind of stuff but then again how could you possibly hope to manually moderate a site as big as youtube?

youtube automates just about everything. They have always been pretty awful about this kind of stuff but then again how could you possibly hope to manually moderate a site as big as youtube?

Didn't that have that stupid ass youtube hero program that lets you mass flag videos?

bitchute is looking great

youtube automates just about everything. They have always been pretty awful about this kind of stuff but then again how could you possibly hope to manually moderate a site as big as youtube?
They could be testing an algorithm and banning channels that it has flagged.


Until you figure out what the real problems are, you're going to be fighting a losing battle lol

GOTTA GET THAT TINFOIL HAT ON.

Youtube is clearly not censoring people.

Calling the stuff youtube is doing censorship is only going to end up with everyone dismissing you as a conspiracy theorist. There's a better conclusion to reach that isn't partisan.

Calling the stuff youtube is doing censorship is only going to end up with everyone dismissing you as a conspiracy theorist. There's a better conclusion to reach that isn't partisan.
Then what is this "Better conclusion"?

Because from where I'm standing, it looks like Patreon has arbitrary rulesets for each individual person. Censoring people on a whim, because they hold the power. And this seems to be inline with the similar actions YouTube has shown to it's creators within the past 6 months.

If arbitrarily banning people for reasons vague or unknown, and the only answer is to apologize for crossing their arbitrary political line, isn't censorship. Then what is it ike?

Then what is this "Better conclusion"?

Because from where I'm standing, it looks like Patreon has arbitrary rulesets for each individual person. Censoring people on a whim, because they hold the power. And this seems to be inline with the similar actions YouTube has shown to it's creators within the past 6 months.

If arbitrarily banning people for reasons vague or unknown, and the only answer is to apologize for crossing their arbitrary political line, isn't censorship. Then what is it ike?
Ah, I see you watched Sargon's video.

If you're wondering why people here are not accepting your messages, I'd refer you to my earlier point. It doesn't matter if calling you two conspiracy theorists is an ad hominem, you have created an image around yourselves as "Annoying Orangetard conspiracy theorists who think everything that disagrees with them is a part of the conspiracy". The reason ad hominems are used is due to the fact that they are effective despite the fallacy that they are. You can blame yourselves for the lack of attention you're receiving.