previously we discussed if whites should be taxed exclusively for being white.
now we turn our heads towards a much more serious topic that is becoming increasingly relevant with the new wave of human rights activism sweeping the globe. culturally speaking there are many different countries with different views on what age is acceptable to consent to loveual relations and the varying numbers begs the question "what?"
The main argument is that children (legal miners (people who mine) (that is, under the age of 19) are not fully autonomous and therefore cannot consent but where this autonomy ends and begins is what the question is, as some countries are tired of having to wait so long to stick their richard in which is kind of sick tbh but that's just me and this is supposed to be a neutral post. now in the America it is usually believed that you can consent to love underage when the other party is within a certain year-age range with the cutoff being 17 years of age after which you may legally do the nasty with your grandparents. USA has been the leading lead of ethics for the world for many centuries which is why so many countries have followed our moral standards for consent between minorities but icky places such as Japan still are icky. To them, however, they are not yicky but are vicky wicky wicky ching chong. I 'have brought up some valuable points that I hope you can use as a basis for discussion
Poll