You people threaten to kill me when I don't post a loving source.
And when I post a source you don't actually loving look at it anyways.
This is loving absurd.
Ok, I'll bite. I watched the entire thing.
At 5:21 He makes a claim that the author has a problem with "gruff white male protagonists" which is just a claim and wasn't necessary to bring up.
He doesn't make the point of the video until 8:05, in a 16 minute video. Why?
At 10:21 He's claimed that she hasn't played the game because she missed one bit of information which, I can safely say - has happened to all of us at some point, and also claims that she doesn't like the "spicy talk" which is never explicitly said.
10:42 - he finally makes the point!!!! Saying "mayb"e 5 times, showing he's not even sure that it's the reason why she gave it a 5... Really?
Onwards to 11:00 and he says that the game doesn't deserve a 5, despite not playing it himself and forgetting that - shocker - opinions exist.
12:15 Calling her a radical SJW and saying they questioned her on why she gave it a 5, despite the fact he has not shown a single "radical SJW" post up to this post or a single reply to said posts that provides a constructive comment. The only comments I've seen on her tweets basically boil down to "Stop making reviews" and "You suck"
And now, finally at the outro - I still have not seen a single thing stating that the woman gave the game a 5 because of SJW reasons. I watched the video up to the outro and all I saw was maybe a hint or two? Nothing solid.
Now maybe I'm wrong - maybe this goes deeper and there are other tweets of hers that states these things and shows she's tanking the review for SJW reasons - but if so, why not show them at the start? Why make me wait 10 minutes just to see your point with no solid evidence of it even being true?
