news outlets say what people want to hear. if people want to hear the shooter was white and tribal, they'll say it. in this world you supply for the demand, anyone who goes against the grain and tries to say what people don't want to hear will not make any money and will be phased out of existence.
Yes, and that's wrong. Justifying them like this is also wrong.
if this was the 1960s, people would want to hear about how the shooter was a communist or was black or a hippie and whenever a crime was committed by someone fitting that description, it would be reported on for weeks because that's how the news works. rarely there were times when something appalling would happen like emmett till and the media would have no choice to cover it, and there was a big uproar from conservative white people about how they didn't want it to be reported on because they don't want to hear anything that violates their view.
Again, this seems to me that you're trying to imply that since it would make some people mad they shouldn't do it. Too loving bad, they're news.
this is why master matthew and tony say stuff like 'the media is causing shootings' whenever there's a tribal white shooter but say 'why isnt the media reporting on this?' whenever there's a sjw liberal shooter. its cuz you forgeters want to hear about liberal shooters
Except my posts are literally proof that you're wrong. I've pointed out that the media causes shootings, and the shooter was a leftist. I don't want to hear about shooters, but it's reality. It happens. The media blatantly ignoring one side and pushing a false narrative to keep their audience in their graces is loving immoral and turns them from journalists to misnamed tabloid writers.
because liberals are evil and conservatives are angels and can't possibly be shooters so their massive media coverage is an insult to your views
Also you're loving insane, and this is blatant projection. No sensible human being thinks in such blatant black and white positions. Many of us have certain specific black and white positions, but very few sensible people out right go "x people bad, y people good". Yes there are some times in which "X people bad" is sensible, however there is almost never a point where "Y people good" is sensible, for example "All terrorists are bad".
You really strike me as the type of person who has main protagonist syndrome, and you've gone ahead and convinced yourself "All Conservatives think X, and Liberals think Y" Except that's asinine.
