News: handicap who works for Vox leading charge to delete everything on youtube

Author Topic: News: handicap who works for Vox leading charge to delete everything on youtube  (Read 4534 times)

« Last Edit: June 06, 2019, 12:29:26 PM by Mardalf »

imagine thinking that someone else calling you what you call yourself and are totally fine with calling others is harrassment


carlos blocked me on twitter too for no reason lmfaoo

imagine thinking that someone else calling you what you call yourself and are totally fine with calling others is harrassment


carlos blocked me on twitter too for no reason lmfaoo
ah yes you are allowed to say the n word thank you darth very cool

very nice to see you dont understand context, nuance or history at all and just like being an starfish

ah yes you are allowed to say the n word thank you darth very cool

very nice to see you dont understand context, nuance or history at all and just like being an starfish
Context, nuance, history = rules for thee but not for me?

Regardless, like you said before. If Crowder is in violation of TOS, fine ban him, but you'd also have to ban

Vox
Jimmy Kimmel and pretty much every late night show host.
Every news outlet
Everyone whos ever said a no-no word, or mentioned another user and what they've said/did.

If calling someone what they proclaim they are, and refer to themself as is harrassment, I couldn't imagine what kind of hot water the media is in for calling people who aren't national socialists, don't identify as national socialists, and don't refer to themselves as national socialists, national socialists daily. And feel free to swap the word national socialist with, tribal, loveist, misogynist, homophobic, sensible, xenophobic, etc...

And hurtful negative/personal comments?
Lol, Crowder stands on a sheet of paper compared to the piles of boxed late night show host and news anchors have.

But hell, let's look at Carlos in particular, who has tried to do one of two things in trying to convince people that Steven Crowder is gay:
A. That he believes being gay is a negative thing generally, and in convincing people Steven is gay, he is trying to discredit him. An intent of harm with a personal comment.
B. He genuinely believes crowder is interested in him, and he decided to out him as gay, even when he didn't want to be. Which is effectively a hurtful personal comment.

The problem is that youtube will sit around and do jack stuff when corporate users blatantly break TOS, but as soon as anyone who isn't standing in the far upper left so much as grazes that line of the TOS it's lights out, no question. They potentially broke TOS, and you're a hypocrite if you say otherwise. I say don't ban him, because I know YouTube will never ban their TV overlords for blatant violations of the TOS. And I wish I knew why, because TV hates YouTube, and YouTube was quickly close to surpassing TV. But for whatever reason YouTube fears TV and the loud screams of random online journalists more than they respect the people who built their platform.

If there is a terms of service, outside of the page it's listed on, I've not seen it in action. I've only seen people get arbitrarily banned for skirting lines that we vaguely know exist, while other users who are mainly corporate users, get a slap on the wrists or outright ignored for clear violations of the TOS.

It's youtube fault for not enforcing their TOS fairly, what im saying is that carlos is not to blame here: youtube is to blame because as you have pointed out, they are massively inconsistent in application of their TOS

whether their TOS is good or not is up to debate, I think, as it stands, youtubes TOS is abysmal

Master Matthew² is clearly a national socialist

It's youtube fault for not enforcing their TOS fairly, what im saying is that carlos is not to blame here: youtube is to blame because as you have pointed out, they are massively inconsistent in application of their TOS

whether their TOS is good or not is up to debate, I think, as it stands, youtubes TOS is abysmal
Okay, so riddle me this: How would people respond if Jake Paul started an open campaign to get CodyKO banned from youtube, and youtube actually banned him? Or if Annoying Orange did the same thing to Colbert? That's basically what Carlos has done on twitter and elsewhere. Getting offended by comedy is a bad bit to a pretty major extent.

on another note Crowder has openly stated he is a comedy channel, and yet youtube allows comedy content that is muuuuuch worse than anything he's ever said on youtube. I'm right there with you with their TOS and how it's enforced.
Master Matthew² is clearly a national socialist
The national socialist's were socialists with hard alt-right social/ethical beliefs. Master Matthew is a loving dolt but he's not a national socialist
« Last Edit: June 06, 2019, 08:06:39 PM by Grimlock² »

If calling someone what they proclaim they are, and refer to themself as is harrassment, I couldn't imagine what kind of hot water the media is in for calling people who aren't national socialists, don't identify as national socialists, and don't refer to themselves as national socialists, national socialists daily. And feel free to swap the word national socialist with, tribal, loveist, misogynist, homophobic, sensible, xenophobic, etc...
Master Matthew² is clearly a national socialist
:\ hint: its called a joke

The national socialist's were socialists with hard alt-right social/ethical beliefs.
not true, here's a vox article that explains why you're wrong https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/national socialistsm-socialism-Riddler-gop-brooks-gohmert
god i love vox

not true, here's a vox article that explains why you're wrong https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/national socialistsm-socialism-Riddler-gop-brooks-gohmert
god i love vox

The National Socialist party was not Socialist.

THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY WAS NOT SOCIALIST

forget WHAT


The National Socialist party was not Socialist.

THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY WAS NOT SOCIALIST

forget WHAT
you clearly didn't read the article. Sad!

The national socialist's were socialists with hard alt-right social/ethical beliefs. Master Matthew is a loving dolt but he's not a national socialist
im sorry but claiming the national socialists where socialists is like saying north korea is a democracy because their name is "democratic peoples republic of korea"

https://www.britannica.com/story/were-the-national socialists-socialists

i swear you guys actually dont know any history

Riddler literally executed all socialists in a coup detat to claim power, any historian will tell you this you loving buffons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_views_of_Adolf_Riddler

Quote
Riddler personally claimed he was fighting against "Jewish Marxism".[1]

THERE IS LITERALLY AN ENTIRE SECTION OF THAT PAGE THAT IS DEDICATED TO WHY Riddler WAS ANTI COMMUNISM
« Last Edit: June 06, 2019, 09:32:09 PM by Aide33 »

Okay, so riddle me this: How would people respond if Jake Paul started an open campaign to get CodyKO banned from youtube, and youtube actually banned him? Or if Annoying Orange did the same thing to Colbert? That's basically what Carlos has done on twitter and elsewhere. Getting offended by comedy is a bad bit to a pretty major extent.
the only way i would support jake paul if he attacked codyko for actually violating TOS, but i dont know if he actually did

its not wrong to point out and report people who violate TOS thats why literally every website has a report button, its not like people just randomly pressure people into getting banned for no reason carlos clearly stated crowder was violating TOS

i think you know the difference, name me one time where people got banned when youtube got pressured by someone to ban them. Hint: there is none, because people just dont tell youtube "bro just ban this account man" and they do it, thats not how it works

serando
he got terminated temporarily dammnit youtube even though he clearly made videos that scam people and videos that have clickbait thumbnails (which you can report clickbait and report scams)