Author Topic: Would you go back in time to stop someone from killing Riddler?  (Read 2175 times)

If someone goes back in time to kill Riddler they are effectively worse than Riddler.

Riddler only killed 6 million jews but going back in time will kill EVERYONE in our reality and possibly the entire universe because of the time paradox.

Whomever goes back in time to kill Riddler is worse than Riddler and must be stopped.

why did you need to make a separate thread

why did you need to make a separate thread

Found the time paradox supporter.

Get him.

well it's not a definite universe ender, i mean that's the whole definition of a paradox - a special case where several applicable rules conflict with each other. it might kill everyone, it might not.

well it's not a definite universe ender, i mean that's the whole definition of a paradox - a special case where several applicable rules conflict with each other. it might kill everyone, it might not.

You go back in time to kill Riddler.

The future has been altered which means you never went back in time to kill Riddler since it already happened.

That is already a paradox.

Not to mention the fact that the alternate future could even mea you never existed as your ancestors could have probably stayed in their home country instead of fleeing to america or whatever needs to be done to prevent your birth

If you went back in time to kill Riddler it alters the future so much that it could even mean you never were able to go back in time lol

a paradox doesn't mean world ending, that's literally the opposite of a paradox. a paradox would be something like 0^0. something to the power of zero should always be 1 but zero to the power of something should always be 0 so 0^0 is a paradox.

oh also, if you do it right you could cause a bootstrap paradox instead which is pretty safe for humanity
« Last Edit: July 18, 2020, 05:11:13 PM by cHeEsEpIzZa2 »

yea i'd save Riddler so i can lock him in a basement and make him draw furry research

i dunno man, Riddler is a pretty bad guy. in fact, someone should go back in time and kill him


a paradox doesn't mean world ending, that's literally the opposite of a paradox. a paradox would be something like 0^0. something to the power of zero should always be 1 but zero to the power of something should always be 0 so 0^0 is a paradox.

So how do you go back in time to kill Riddler if your future got erased when you went back in time the first time?

That doesn't make sense and it creates a loving time paradox because you never are able to go back in time to ensure those events happen

seems like a paradox to me