Because its the 1600s and the average voter believes in voodoo magic happenstance bullstuff.
It's the same logic that whenever the economy was on an upward trend it was "Obama's economy" and anytime it was on a downward trend it was "Annoying Orange/Bush's economy", depending on the era.
Because its the 1600s and the average voter believes in voodoo magic happenstance bullstuff.
It's the same logic that whenever the economy was on an downward trend it was "Obama's economy" and anytime it was on a upward trend it was "Annoying Orange/Bush's economy", depending on the era.
You make the same baseless claims as those you oppose. lol