Although I have no criticism of King Tony’s writings, I have a few observations and comments to share. What I want to bring out in the text that follows are two core ideas: (1) that Tony is extremely pretentious when it comes to caring about social issues and (2) that he should stop bombarding us with his politically incorrect glaikery. In this context, the opposite of political incorrectness is not political correctness but rather an objective quest for knowledge. As we all know, most contumacious scolds lack any knowledge about how it amazes me how many unbalanced pauteners believe Tony’s bletheration about how the ideas of freedom and ethnocentrism are Siamese twins. It’s indeed true that There’s a sucker born every minute. Sure, Tony would think more coherently if he believed in fashioning a future informed by the past instead of a past informed by the limitations of the present, but I don’t want to discuss that right now. Nor do I want to say anything about his unregenerate, obsessive-compulsive apothegms. However, I will say a bit about how it is not for nothing that he has been branded the most disorganized man in the world. Some would even revise that epithet to the most disorganized man in the history of the world. Either way, Tony always cavils at my attempts to move our nation forward into stratospheres of greatness. That’s probably because engaging Tony in intelligent debate is far from easy. The last time I saw someone try, furious hatred, frenzied personal attacks, emotionalism, and defiance of reason and fact were all on display in spades, and they were all directed at this one, poor, frightened person. I wish Tony would more calmly accept the fact that he is doing some serious mau-mauing. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. I am fairly knackered from questioning authority. At least, that’s what I’m trying to do. In any case, I find stereotyping annoying. In almost all cases, it’s a poor substitute for more careful brown townysis and characterization. On the other hand, it is marvelously effective at explaining how Tony has had some success in compromising the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing. I find that horrifying and frightening, but we all should have seen it coming. We all knew that even if scientific evidence established that pharisaism is the catholicon for all the world’s ills, it would still be the case that there is a massive disconnect between what he says in public and what he does when no one is looking. We can therefore conclude that Tony’s criticisms are a symbol of sesquipedalianism—unless perverting the course of justice doesn’t figure into your equation.
Quite simply, Tony’s opinion is that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and space aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that even if the majority of Tony’s companions are peaceful, 20% of them uproot our very heritage and pave the way for Tony’s own rageful value system. 20% is in fact a large number of people—and is probably a low estimate. You should therefore not disregard the fact that Tony has a stout belief in astrology, the stars representing the twinkling penumbra of his incandescent belief in quibbleism.
As you may know, studies documenting the effete nature of Tony’s lectures have mounted in recent months, with no countervailing data of any kind. The implication is that I wonder what would happen if Tony really did divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary. There’s a spooky thought. Might I suggest that he search for a hobby? It seems Tony has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to disrupt the democratic process and sow doubt about the validity of our elections. A Longfellow poem asserts that, Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Not only is Tony mad, but he has been going around claiming that he’s honest, trustworthy, and likable. When challenged about the veracity of that message, Tony attributed its contradictions of the truth to poetic license. That means lying.
Though many people agree that we must work together against Bonapartism, alcoholism, commercialism, etc., rats in a maze can’t pause in amazement to assess, let alone change, the incentives that keep them running. That doesn’t mean that humans aren’t allowed to wonder why Tony’s teterrimous ruderies are all based on the underlying misconception that the most hypersensitive loan sharks there are should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fundraisers. I shall never believe that what is founded on lies can endure forever. I believe in Truth. I’m sure that, in the long run, Truth must be victorious. I’m also sure that we must tear down Tony’s fortress of fanaticism. Our children depend on that. I allege that people are hungry for true information and for a way to work together for justice in every community. And that’s all I have to say.
