Author Topic: 1-10 ratings  (Read 1878 times)

I know this is a big newby question but
if you were to rate a 5/10 what would that mean?
such as

2= your a big lousy noob

10= the most ultimate build ever

stuff like that

A 5/10 would be half.  Meaning meh pretty basic.  Most likely you won't make it into a clan or get any fame for it.  It is just average.


I haven't really thought about that... here's a rough idea of them.

0 - No pics / nothing built
1 - < 5 bricks
2 - Spam.
3 - Spam that has some shape.
4 - Horrible.
5 - Needs a LOT of work.
6 - Not that great, but not horrible.
7 - Looks pretty good, could be improved.
8 - Looks great, just needs some minor details.
9 - Amazing, just missing something.
10 - Perfect. Nothing could be improved in ANY way.

Ok that pretty much covers it.  Nobody has to post now.  Lock.

Different people have different standards, and I think it'd be interesting to see what other people consider to be a 6/10 and such.

I prefers X-play's (I used to watch them) style of rating out of five:

1-Very below average, basicly worthless
2. Below average, bad, but not compleate crap.
3. Average
4. Above average, either is not quite perfect, or has a flaw bringing it down.
5- Very above average, basically near, or is perfect.

This gives the best range for rating in my opinion.  With a ten or a hundred point scale, 1.53 or a 2.25 are both crap, small numbers mean little.  Also, with such a rating system, most people who are impartial will give the same raiting.

no one gives proper rates anyway. someone could just think a build is "kind of cool" and give it a rating of 8/10. thats way to generous for most all builds that exist in gallery


i should start rating out of 3 lol. would blow your minds

0-crap
1-abysmal
2-terrible
3-bad
4-poor
5-mediocre
6-fair
7-good
8-great
9-superb
10-perfect

How about a rubric? Like a table full of different qualties that add up to x number out of lets say 50?

I think a standardized rating system would be great, if it is well thought out and agreed upon by the conmunity, who agrees?
no one gives proper rates anyway. someone could just think a build is "kind of cool" and give it a rating of 8/10. thats way to generous for most all builds that exist in gallery


i should start rating out of 3 lol. would blow your minds
Not that bad of an idea, but I prefer out of 5 just because you can say a build is better then average without saying it is as good as the Titanic.


I can't remember where it was but they used ratings out of 20.

-0/10 - No pics, no rate.
0/10 - Epic failure.
1/10 - Awful.
2/10 - Horrible.
3/10 - Really lame.
4/10 - Bad.
5/10 - Average.
6/10 - Okay...
7/10 - Good, needs improvements though.
8/10 - Better, but still some details missing.
9/10 - Great, something is odd about it though.
10/10 - Flawless.
Win/10 - EPIC WIN.