How are you compiling these c++es? You compiler certainly wasn't made with C++. Yes, they may not of been made with assembly code, but they could of been.
What has culture got to do with this?Also, Ninja edit;I don't need to sound Cultured, or anything else, I pay little attention to other people's opinions of me.
This makes no sense. My point was that your browser or OS wasn't made using C++ but they could of been made with C++ yet you couldn't make it with PHP.
I am unable to see how that point is even relevant to prior discussions?
Because why would PHP need to exist if there were no web browsers or OSs?
Why would C++ need to exist if there were no computers?
Thats still totally irrelevant. Why would C++ need to exist if there were no computers? See. That adds no meat to this debate. I don't even recall saying PHP would exist without web browsers.
How can you possibly jump to the defense of a language over which you have no mastery whatsoever? It's like you leech onto all these internet buzzwords like "C++" and "OpenGL" and any learned person that rightfully impugns your stubborn idiocy is a heretic.
It's proving that PHP is inferior to C++. C++ is still useful to someone who doesn't use the web whereas PHP isn't.
besides as Trader said you can't really argue the case for a language you suck at (as you proved earlier in this thread)
Assembly sucks, nobody's good at it, because it sucks.
I mean even I know more C++ than you and I haven't even bought a book on it (don't lie, you have)
Thank god your opinion is invalid in this discussion or we might have a serious logistical problem on our hands here!!
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
Nothing in Articles 10, 11 and 14 shall be regarded as preventing the High Contracting Parties from imposing restrictions on the political activity of aliens.
