Author Topic: Post real life pictures of yourself.  (Read 10326203 times)


I'm so tired of this stuff, it doesn't make sense.

AlsoNo
Then think about it some more. You're not getting it.

AlsoYes

http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs442.snc3/25367_109166349108479_100000453433322_167291_2310863_n.jpg
I hasn't posted a pic thingy in a while...
Take off the shirt. :cookieMonster:

AlsoYes
I don't see where you got that from. Being half of anything does not make you that thing fully. Please explain how you came to such a conclusion.

Take off the shirt. :cookieMonster:
I LIKE THE WAY YOU THINK. ;D

Also, this is old but funny.

:D

Bomer may horris! It's Dr. Robotnik!

« Last Edit: March 28, 2010, 06:47:19 PM by WhoDa? »

Take off the shirt. :cookieMonster:

the only ones i have from that day without a shirt on only show my shoulders

Take off the shirt. :cookieMonster:
I don't see where you got that from. Being half of anything does not make you that thing fully. Please explain how you came to such a conclusion.
The FDA is where I get the idea.

the only ones i have from that day without a shirt on only show my shoulders
But... But... There is a very simple solution to that! :(

The FDA is where I get the idea.
I'm may be in the wrong here, but the Food and Drug Administration is where you get you that?

Seeing as I'm far too lazy to look through the site, I'm just going to assume that arguing with you about something so pointless is not worth my time.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2010, 07:37:35 PM by Doorman »

I didn't know so many emos hung out online

Like this guy  :cookieMonster:

But... But... There is a very simple solution to that! :(
I'm may be in the wrong here, but the Food and Drug Administration is where you get you that?

Seeing as I'm far too lazy to look through the site, I'm just going to assume that arguing with you about something so pointless is not worth my time.
You are right, it's the FDA you're thinking of and I've done research.

The FDA (Food Drug Administration) says that a product can be labeled as such even if it is not 100% of the in-package item. I know this for a distinct fact because of my allergy to Pork. The FDA says that you can label hot dogs "all beef" even when they contain up to 20% pork and other forms of meats. So all-beef hot dogs can still make me sick just like anyone allergic to peanuts has to be just as careful around any form of cookies or candy.

A program regulated and funded by the government seems to think partial percentage makes a whole. I'm pretty sure they would also consider anyone who shows any loveual interest in males to be gay whether or not that percentage of preference is more or less than 50%

You are right, it's the FDA you're thinking of and I've done research.

The FDA (Food Drug Administration) says that a product can be labeled as such even if it is not 100% of the in-package item. I know this for a distinct fact because of my allergy to Pork. The FDA says that you can label hot dogs "all beef" even when they contain up to 20% pork and other forms of meats. So all-beef hot dogs can still make me sick just like anyone allergic to peanuts has to be just as careful around any form of cookies or candy.

A program regulated and funded by the government seems to think partial percentage makes a whole. I'm pretty sure they would also consider anyone who shows any loveual interest in males to be gay whether or not that percentage of preference is more or less than 50%

Ah, I see. Well, despite my previous comment, I will, in a sense, argue with you and point out my problems with that.

You see, that means that a so called "biloveual" that has had interest in both males and females, he can only be labels as gay or straight? There is something wrong with that picture.

Bomer may horris! It's Dr. Robotnik!


LOL! He looks so sad D:

You REALLY want to see me?

Fine

that dog died in 2005

that dog died in 2005

I know my ghostly fingers go through the u key when I type fck