Author Topic: Post real life pictures of yourself.  (Read 10286513 times)

Vikings have no time to fold steel when they can be pillaging filthy peasants.
But their blades loose their edge, a samurai has the edge for a really long time :c

Plus it's not even near as heavy as the other swords.

But their blades loose their edge, a samurai has the edge for a really long time :c

Plus it's not even near as heavy as the other swords.
Not everyone is looking for lightweight. Sometimes heavy just feels nice. Also if your sword starts to lose its edge you should probably sharpen it duh.

They also lack cross-guards.

EDIT: at least in the case of mine, not all viking swords really have one, or one that protrudes very far.

EDITEDIT: also, katanas are generally two-handed unless you're unorthodox with swordsmanship. Vikings get shields, or another sword.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 01:21:27 PM by Sabbin »

Not everyone is looking for lightweight. Sometimes heavy just feels nice. Also if your sword starts to lose its edge you should probably sharpen it duh.
try swinging a broad sword 10 times in 10 seconds, by the time you go for the second one the samurai would've cut you in half.

Not as easy as you think.

Katanas are for slashing, and broadswords for hacking or thrusting. Those two require sheer weight or power where slashing requires precision or speed.

try swinging a broad sword 10 times in 10 seconds, by the time you go for the second one the samurai would've cut you in half.

Not as easy as you think.
No stuff. This is why I carry a gun. You're not going to be out there in the field today swinging around a samurai sword like a Ninja. I have a collection of broadswords and I even have a set of Katanas. When you're collecting outdated weaponry, field work is less of a concern. It's not about the weight or sharpness of the blade per-say, its just the one you get the most appeal from. In my case it's the heavy weight class. I also don't have puny-ass arms.

They also lack cross-guards.

EDIT: at least in the case of mine, not all viking swords really have one, or one that protrudes very far.

EDITEDIT: also, katanas are generally two-handed unless you're unorthodox with swordsmanship. Vikings get shields, or another sword.
Katana swordsmanship was based around the idea of dodging an attack whilst slicing the opponent at the same time, they have no need for shields!

Actually, if I were to choose, a Bastard (Hand and a half) Sword would be my sword of choice.

No stuff. This is why I carry a gun. You're not going to be out there in the field today swinging around a samurai sword like a Ninja. I have a collection of broadswords and I even have a set of Katanas. When you're collecting outdated weaponry, field work is less of a concern. It's not about the weight or sharpness of the blade per-say, its just the one you get the most appeal from. In my case it's the heavy weight class. I also don't have puny-ass arms.
Swordsmen will fear my sledge hammer from a local home depot.

Actually, if I were to choose, a Bastard (Hand and a half) Sword would be my sword of choice.
Sword is likely to best the gun if a zombie apocalypse happened.

Sword is likely to best the gun if a zombie apocalypse happened.

I'm not even talking about an apocalypse, I just like the bastard sword.

I'm not even talking about an apocalypse, I just like the bastard sword.
but we got into the topic of guns and favourite weapons :c


Bows > guns
I forgot all about bows!
But yeah, bows could kill THE PEOPLE APOCALYPSE and the ammo is easy to make.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 01:54:37 PM by Maxwell23461 »

are you taking a stuff on SOMETHING CAUSE THIS IS A LIE

The kind of guy who owns a katana is the kind of guy who also owns a fedora.