i need to rant about this 3d mouse
now dont get me wrong, i loving love this mouse. ive never been able to look at maya, cinema 4d, google sketchup, mudbox etc. etc. the same way again, but...
im incredibly frustrated with the fact the only adobe products spacenav works with as of now is photoshop, acrobat, and reader
correct me if im wrong, but after effects literally has more 3D possibility than all those combined. why on earth did they pick all those over after effects? where those seriously more logical choices? 3D camera work would be infinity times easier in every single way, shape, or form with spacenavs insane control, and you'd be able to produce much more cleaner, complex results... yet they went with those. photoshops kind of understandable with its 3D content, but acrobat and reader?
as far as im concerned (please correct me if im wrong) you cant even model with acrobat OR reader. you'd only use it to view models in acrobat, and thats cool and all it would definitely make it easier, but why are those the initial releases?
im sure theres a logical explanation to that, but there is just too much potential in this mouse to be wasted on document readers, initially
im sorry for being mad, but i use after effects a lot and it really bothers me its not compatible, but all those are
You can't model with after effects either, and getting a model into it is annoying as well. Not to mention that once you get 3d objects in it they are still bound by layers and not 3D space.
