Wait, Ghost, your a creationist?
As of right now yes, but I'm still challenging it. I have heard arguments about starlight, fossils, etc., but they have been refuted quite easily. And once you understand the magnetic field of the earth (it was stronger but its decreasing which means it can only have been so strong so it can tell the age of the earth), inconsistencies with carbon dating, etc., then Creationism seems more plausible. The website I posted before,
http://drdino.com, answers many questions about evolution, the big band, and many other scenarios which really made sense to me logically.
Trial and error does not need any sort of intelligence behind. Bad mutations die, good ones live. Even better ones are stronger and more likely to mate.
If there is no intelligence then wouldn't there just be error and no progress? We make progress by learning from mistakes. Also if bad mutations die then why are there still bad mutations around? If a frog becomes a human then the frog should die out.
People created God so they have someone to blame
Your mom dies of cancer. Why god!?
Your dog dies. Why god?!
You get laid off from your job. Why god?!
That's an assumption.