Author Topic: What happened to the English language?  (Read 9909 times)

You don't need to be kidding to start an argument. For instance if I said "I believe in God" and "I believe gays should be able to marry" I would be completely serious, but I bet someone would call me out on them and some random argument would start...

While I'm on the verge of starting an argument anyways, stop being such a republican, learn to be open minded, and don't be such a tribal.
He's not tribal. You see, I'm black myself and I'm FED up with the huge amount of stupidity involving black people.

Every school is trying their best to educate them. But sadly, a some of them think it's "too-nerdy", and acting "gangsta" would make them cool.
before i noticed this thread, i thought you were a logical person.
youre bitching will get you absolutely nowhere, and honestly it just makes you look roostery.
why?
because most of the posts you are making right now convey "im so incredibly perfect at grammar and spelling, and everyone else is a loving handicap for not being so damn obsessive about every single piece of grammar that they post on the internet."even though the internet honestly could care less.
now i know that in certain situations this grammar you love so dearly is needed, such as writing formal essays and lab reports and other such instances.
however, this isnt quite an essay, now is it?
no i think not.
Writing formal doesn't have anything to do with it. If you have bad grammar in a argument, guess what? Your argument is weak, people will think you have terrible logic, and finally you may have a terrible reputation for being stupid. Unless you have an excuse such as being in an another country. But this isn't the case here.

OH NO. SO IT WILL SPREAD THROUGHOUT GAYS FASTER NOW. Who cares, let them kill themselves, no loss for you. If that's what they want let them have it.

Also the reason for that is because the original contractor of AIDS was gay.
He's not tribal. You see, I'm black myself and I'm FED up with the huge amount of stupidity involving black people.

True or not, the way he said it, the fact he's a family man, and the fact he stereotyped Europeans as well all point to him being tribal...
« Last Edit: May 01, 2009, 11:12:57 PM by Mateo »

Oh, they do.  But you're missing my point.  HIV is more commonly found (Large increase, 30%) in the homoloveual culture than the heteroloveual culture.  In areas with high amounts of homoloveuality, (California) HIV has a higher presence.  All evidence points towards it being more easily transmitted by homoloveuals.
Well, why should you care about them getting HIV?  Since you don't support gay marriage, let them have it, get HIV and die!  I don't see who doesn't win, the homoloveuals are homoloveual, and you get rid of them because they die of HIV!

OH NO. SO IT WILL SPREAD THROUGHOUT GAYS FASTER NOW. Who cares, let them kill themselves, no loss for you. If that's what they want let them have it.

Also the reason for that is because the original contractor of AIDS was gay.

>original contractor of AIDS was gay.
I was just looking up the source for that, but I'm glad you agree with me-

Wait, weren't you just defending gays?  Invalidating your own point!  If this were a formal debate, my friend, you would have just forfeited.

Actually no. I was invalidating your point, explaining how your point really doesn't matter. So what if they have HIV, that does not affect you in any way if you aren't gay yourself.

OH NO. SO IT WILL SPREAD THROUGHOUT GAYS FASTER NOW. Who cares, let them kill themselves, no loss for you. If that's what they want let them have it.

Also the reason for that is because the original contractor of AIDS was gay.
Well, why should you care about them getting HIV?  Since you don't support gay marriage, let them have it, get HIV and die!  I don't see who doesn't win, the homoloveuals are homoloveual, and you get rid of them because they die of HIV!
The thing is that STDs can be spreaded...
>original contractor of AIDS was gay.
I was just looking up the source for that, but I'm glad you agree with me-

Wait, weren't you just defending gays?  Invalidating your own point!  If this were a formal debate, my friend, you would have just forfeited.
He is supporting them, he's just not being biased.

Well, why should you care about them getting HIV?  Since you don't support gay marriage, let them have it, get HIV and die!  I don't see who doesn't win, the homoloveuals are homoloveual, and you get rid of them because they die of HIV!

But I dislike death, be it in homoloveuals or any other loveuality.  Do you care if someone dies?  No?  How about your parents?  That'd have more impact.  Do you think those people that died have relatives?  No?  Well you're stupid.  The people that die have people who care about them.  Think about that, and Shut your WHORE MOUTH.

>original contractor of AIDS was gay.
I was just looking up the source for that, but I'm glad you agree with me-

Wait, weren't you just defending gays?  Invalidating your own point!  If this were a formal debate, my friend, you would have just forfeited.
He was pointing out the reason of why it spreads through homoloveuals faster.  He wasn't forfeiting in any way.

Actually no. I was invalidating your point, explaining how your point really doesn't matter. So what if they have HIV, that does not affect you in any way if you aren't gay yourself.
Kody made the point I was going to make at you.
He was pointing out the reason of why it spreads through homoloveuals faster.  He wasn't forfeiting in any way.
STOP POSTING, forget

But I dislike death, be it in homoloveuals or any other loveuality.  Do you care if someone dies?  No?  How about your parents?  That'd have more impact.  Do you think those people that died have relatives?  No?  Well you're stupid.  The people that die have people who care about them.  Think about that, and Shut your WHORE MOUTH.

Actually no. I don't give a damn about death. No matter what we do people will die and there's nothing you can do about it. It is only a matter of when.

Also if they want to risk getting AIDS it is their choice, not yours.

Actually no. I don't give a damn about death. No matter what we do people will die and there's nothing you can do about it. It is only a matter of when.

Also if they want to risk getting AIDS it is their choice, not yours.
What are you, a heartless bastard?  Mother died of cancer at age 7?  Damn dog, you're cold, as word on the street is.  Was that hip enough for you?  Cool enough?

What is you, a heartless bastard?  Mother got a cap popped in ho ass at age 7?  Damn dawg, you coad.

Obviously not "hip enough."

But I dislike death, be it in homoloveuals or any other loveuality.  Do you care if someone dies?  No?  How about your parents?  That'd have more impact.  Do you think those people that died have relatives?  No?  Well you're stupid.  The people that die have people who care about them.  Think about that, and Shut your WHORE MOUTH.
Well, it is not their relative's decision to tell them what they can do or not, it is their decision, not yours.  If it is within reason, they should be allowed to do it, not just because you don't like people dying.  Whore mouth?  Is that really the polite way to debate?

Oh well.  Back on-topic, though,  What the forget is up with people who can't type coherently? (Read:Azimuth)

Oh well.  Back on-topic, though,  What the forget is up with people who can't type coherently? (Read:Azimuth)
NO YOU