my god again man.
but to retort, i dont feel that this is a formal argument, a formal argument would include less attacking of the arguer as we are doing, and more attack and retort of the points themselves.
thus why i made the notion that grammar really shouldnt matter, when up against the content.
but hey you know, im only in 9th grade at the best SoCal private school, so i guess that makes me a total handicap.
I used "an" correctly, or if you're willing to think that I'm wrong, please show me the rule for it.
I also didn't think that this was a argument, more of a debate. Grammar, in my opinion, is very necessary. Take
an(see, I used "an" incorrectly) a typical gangster for example, he doesn't speak formal, and uses terrible logic.
Because of the stereotypes of that gangster, people will sadly assume that you can't make a good argument because of bad grammar.
I'm not really one of those people who skim one-fourth of the reasoning and assume that, "HURR HURR HES AN IDIOT THAT USES TERRIBLE LOGIC", for using it. In fact, I read all of it, whether it has bad grammar or not and listen to their point.
EDIT: I would occasionally edit, it's considered my second proofreading.
