Child research - Loophole?

[Messes]

Watch and learn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PooEhBxh0NY

I'm feeling like stuff at the moment so I can't really reply on my comment, but yeah its bad 

Every time a women has a male child, the chance of him being homoloveual increases because of the Mom's anti-bodies think of the fetus as a foreign object, thus trying to feminize it. Genes have no more to do with it than you being left/ right handed. :D Haha that part was interesting.

[Ad Bot]

[Muffinmix]

Watch and learn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PooEhBxh0NY

I had a feeling it was gained from birth, still it's strange how nature operates that way. So really you can't "fix" homoloveuality because nature intended it that way and the consequences would be fairly bad.

Here's the thing though, is child enthusiasm the same deal? And if that's the case then how do you go about handling something like that? It would technically be immoral to subjugate child enthusiasts to "treatment", yet simultaneously immoral IF they were to harm a child, and also immoral to tag them and shun them from society simply because they might pose a risk to children. Every option here is bad, I guess it's just up to the people to decide which is "less" bad or less bad to them anyways.

[Mateo]

If what that video said is true, then gays can change to be (at the very least) biloveual. If I really, really, really wanted to I could become right handed.

[Ronin]

I had a feeling it was gained from birth, still it's strange how nature operates that way. So really you can't "fix" homoloveuality because nature intended it that way and the consequences would be fairly bad.

Here's the thing though, is child enthusiasm the same deal? And if that's the case then how do you go about handling something like that? It would technically be immoral to subjugate child enthusiasts to "treatment", yet simultaneously immoral IF they were to harm a child, and also immoral to tag them and shun them from society simply because they might pose a risk to children. Every option here is bad, I guess it's just up to the people to decide which is "less" bad or less bad to them anyways.

The action of harming children is a dehumanizing crime. The punishment is often dehumanizing as well. But it is so heinous that I doubt the laws will be changed to be more lenient, justice has to be served in a civilized order.

[Ghoul]

My opinion of Today's Moral Views:

Homoloveuality: Two men or two women having loveual intercourse cannot impregnate either member of the partnership. However, both members are usually mature and can make logical decisions. This means that it's their choice to have loveual intercourse. To some or most people, this makes it morally OK.

child enthusiasm: An adult having loveual intercourse with a child cannot impregnate either member of the partnership. However, because of the fact that the child cannot decide for his/herself, it is the adult who chooses to be with the child. This is considered taking advantage over the child, and therefore, is morally wrong.

Basically, society sees a difference between moral and immoral loveual intercourse based on the maturity or intelligence of either or both of the members of the "relationship".

Of course, in my opinion, this is just one of many ways society determines right from wrong.

[Kalphiter]

Michael Jackson is a molester because of his childhood. In no way was he molested, anyway.

[Jimmg]

Michael Jackson is a molester.

Get the forget out. No he isn't.

[sir dooble]

Michael Jackson.

No, just keep that out of here alltogether. That does not belong here, and an entirely different matter alltogether.

[oromis]

I agree with sir whatshisface. But before that subject dies:

Michael Jackson isn't the only child molester. He is just the only one people make fun of. Why? It is one of those questions only God can answer.

[Otis Da HousKat]

I agree with sir whatshisface. But before that subject dies:

Michael Jackson isn't the only child molester. He is just the only one people make fun of. Why? It is one of those questions only God can answer.

Because he was a washed up celebrity...

[Thorax]

I agree with sir whatshisface. But before that subject dies:

Michael Jackson isn't the only child molester. He is just the only one people make fun of. Why? It is one of those questions only God can answer.

Because he was a washed up celebrity...

Otis is God?

[Jimmg]

I agree with sir whatshisface. But before that subject dies:

Michael Jackson isn't the only child molester.

Get the forget out. No he isn't.