Author Topic: New shoes, NikeID  (Read 5042 times)

also DC shoes are for black people and wiggers

and globes are for blind people


I had some Mark Appleyard(?) Globes, and they were fantastic. DC is pretty generic, and only pompous motherforgeters wear white shoes.

No. Vans.
Hell Yes

About Nike, I've got a job this summer $10 per hour 7 hours a day, 5 days a week this summer... only bad thing is hair has to be above eyes, so I have to get cut before July :C



I had some Mark Appleyard(?) Globes, and they were fantastic. DC is pretty generic, and only pompous motherforgeters wear white shoes.

the globes are alright but i'm pretty sure that every shoe company makes shoes that are a solid color

oh and the dc shoes are ugly as forget. solid black shoes are gay as hell. the snow camo is a good touch for when you're in the snow hiding from people so they don't see you wearing DCs

Bar lacing shoes looks so horrid.

oh and the dc shoes are ugly as forget. solid black shoes are gay as hell. the snow camo is a good touch for when you're in the snow hiding from people so they don't see you wearing DCs
I grabbed a couple random pictures, I wasn't referring to color schemes. I prefer tan/brown shoes.

Also I lol'd.

Cmon, guys, Converse hi-tops.

Converse look ridiculous.


Shoes for the skater posers

Maybe they wear them but they are definitely not FOR them.

Shoes for the skater posers
They're extremely comfortable, even when running.

They're extremely comfortable, even when running.
This

Shoes are serious business.

I get some Airwalk slip-on shoes.  Really comfortable and look kinda neat.


I've never really been that much into shoe-fashion. A $20 pair of tennis shoes and some dress shoes for work gets me by.

I generally end up getting New Balance shoes, simply because they are one of the few (perhaps the only) companies that offer their trainers in extra-wide sizes and in the long sizes I need for my feet.

I'd post some preachy lecture about how foolish it seems to me for someone to spend hundreds of dollars on clothing, especially shoes, but that would be hypocritical as I myself am prone to spending outlandish amounts of my own money on computer components.

That being said, badmouthing a certain brand should be backed up with facts. Saying for example "Nike shoes suck" would be as bad as me stating "Rosewill makes stuffty cases". Unless you back it up with "Nike shoes have been proven in tests to lower the running speed of athletes" or if I were to say "Rosewill cases are a poor choice due to their shoddy construction, generally sharp edges and lack of features" your just blowing smoke out of your ass.