Nothing anymore

[Frogg]

Ok, I am gonna give up soon, but one more time:

NO ONE IS GONNA WIN!!!!!

[Ad Bot]

[Inv3rted]

Light is not matter according to my science book.

Light is matter. Photons might not have mass when they are not moving, but because an object moving at the speed of light will have infinite mass, photons have mass as they exist in the Universe. Freeze a photon and you'll get a Nobel prize.

Actually, I've done more research, and photons do not have mass and therefore are not matter.

[zackin5]

...you are such an ignorant bastard I don't have words for it.

Proof.

You want me to show you every little bit of evidence? Impossible. Show me ONE loving BIT of evidence of creationism.

Don't try arguing with a religious nut. they just look all over your reply for some back hole and they use it until they win or the competition gives up

[Block Builder]

Colorblind, night time, how do we know we exist, etc.
I'm too lazy to continue a fake argument

But the object will still be the colour it was before if you turn a light on.\


@frogg-Gtfo, stopping spamming that. The atheists basically win every time one of these threads show up because we are the only ones posting links to our evidence and proof. The creationists just keep going to the loving bible.

[All of us]

But the object will still be the colour it was before if you turn a light on.\


@frogg-Gtfo, stopping spamming that. The atheists basically win every time one of these threads show up because we are the only ones posting links to our evidence and proof. The creationists just keep going to the loving bible.

an object is invisible if no light is reflecting off of it, it has no color

[Skele]

an object is invisible if no light is reflecting off of it, it has no color

It's not invisible, it's just black.

[Moppy]

...you are such an ignorant bastard I don't have words for it.

Proof.

You want me to show you every little bit of evidence? Impossible. Show me ONE loving BIT of evidence of creationism.

First, I want to point out the countadictions in evolution and howit was founded.
1: First, Darwins canaries changed beaks why? Because they adapted to their environment.
You think "Hey! Because they change beaks, why not change entire figures and altogether new speicies?"  I tell you THAT is rediculus. They were only changing their beaks,not their speicies.

2: Evolution says that "A looong time ago, Therewas a tiny moulecule that sundenly It fused with another molecule for nogood reason.(Note that this is by chance) Then they fused with another molecule lying around, then they turned into a living thing some how." Stupid huh? Why would they get together by chance when they can't even do it with our help now? And don't say "we haven't even tried", We have, and we failed.

3:The fossils are not Proof. First, radio carbon dating is not accurate at all. Studies show that there was an artifact from a volcano that dated 20,000 years old, but in fact, the people living around the area say that they can recall that the volcano erupted 20 years ago. Second, If there was evolution, where are the mixed chikencow-rexes? Where are the mixed animals and fossils of them? I have this reason to beleive they don't exist.
And lastly, There have been fosils of hats, defenateley not millions of years old. here is the pic.
To be continued...

[All of us]

It's not invisible, it's just black.

FFFFFFFFFFFFF

[Skele]

First, I want to point out the countadictions in evolution and howit was founded.
1: First, Darwins canaries changed beaks why? Because they adapted to their environment.
You think "Hey! Because they change beaks, why not change entire figures and altogether new speicies?"  I tell you THAT is rediculus. They were only changing their beaks,not their speicies.

2: Evolution says that "A looong time ago, Therewas a tiny moulecule that sundenly It fused with another molecule for nogood reason.(Note that this is by chance) Then they fused with another molecule lying around, then they turned into a living thing some how." Stupid huh? Why would they get together by chance when they can't even do it with our help now? And don't say "we haven't even tried", We have, and we failed.

3:The fossils are not Proof. First, radio carbon dating is not accurate at all. Studies show that there was an artifact from a volcano that dated 20,000 years old, but in fact, the people living around the area say that they can recall that the volcano erupted 20 years ago. Second, If there was evolution, where are the mixed chikencow-rexes? Where are the mixed animals and fossils of them? I have this reason to beleive they don't exist.
And lastly, There have been fosils of hats, defenateley not millions of years old. here is the pic.
To be continued...

You realize that evolution is a long process. Then again, you believe the world was created in 7 days, so how do we expect you to understand that simple concept.

[Inv3rted]

Moppy, have you taken a single course on molecular biology? I think not. I doubt you even know how life works at the cellular and molecular level.

The fossilized hat is most likely because of a cataclysmic natural event, for example a volcanic eruption. The extreme heat and pressure could fossilize something faster.

[Randomguy]

blah

3:The fossils are not Proof. First, radio carbon dating is not accurate at all. Studies show that there was an artifact from a volcano that dated 20,000 years old, but in fact, the people living around the area say that they can recall that the volcano erupted 20 years ago. Second, If there was evolution, where are the mixed chikencow-rexes? Where are the mixed animals and fossils of them? I have this reason to beleive they don't exist

blah

Ahahaha. Let me dig up an older post of mine. You apparently don't realize how many forms of dating there are.

You act as though C-14 dating is the only kind there is. There are numerous others, including:

Potassium-Argon dating
Argon-Argon dating
Rubidium-Strontium dating
Samarium-Neodymium dating
Lutetium-Hafnium dating
Rhenium-Osmium dating

And all of the aforementioned methods, as well as C-14 dating, seem to agree.

And to the bold, you're correct; they don't exist. Evolution is a slow process. You have no clue what you're talking about.

[Moppy]

Moppy, have you taken a single course on molecular biology? I think not. I doubt you even know how life works at the cellular and molecular level.

The fossilized hat is most likely because of a cataclysmic natural event, for example a volcanic eruption. The extreme heat and pressure could fossilize something faster.

Youve just contradicted yourself.
You've proven that such a thing, such as bones, could be fosilized in less than millions of years. Therefore, bones could be only 50 years old. and in the case of noahs flood, a few thousand.

[Frogg]

Okay, now I give up.

[Inv3rted]

Youve just contradicted yourself.
You've proven that such a thing, such as bones, could be fosilized in less than millions of years. Therefore, bones could be only 50 years old. and in the case of noahs flood, a few thousand.

Because everything that ever lived died from a volcanic eruption. If you dated that hat of yours, it should show the proper date. When a fossil is discovered, they date it. Please stop thinking that you're so intelligent when you don't know what the forget you're saying.

[Sandvich]

Internet + Religion = War