The Blockland Forums

[Godik7]

When did age defines how smart someone is?

[Ad Bot]

[cambiogris]

When did age defines how smart someone is?

It's a generalization. Younger people can be comparatively clever but in general are far less intelligent because they have not had the necessary life experience and education yet.

e: My observations of those on this forum have yet to stray from the trend. . .

[zz_tophat]

Your loss.

Nay, for i find this amusing, insulting you is hardly a chore, it's a pleasure.

I like it because it does not make me feel bad and it does not make me feel bad because you have it coming. Opinions are rarely right or wrong, there are simply that, an opinion. For you to dismiss someone's opinion on the basis they are are younger or less educated is foolhardy. It proves you are not wise, you have already proven you are not smart what's more by finally giving ground on some of your views you have shown a lack of convictions.

Stupid, unlearned, spineless, agitating & a presumptuous. This is you, this is how you have acted. Apologize or leave but don"t continue to defend your actions. As far as I can tell you haven't insulted me yet (doing so it probably beyond your ability, I have a very thick skin) but you have been remarkably rude to the other people is this thread.

Stay in this thread and continue your rebuttals, I will personally tear them apart. I am older than and smarter and if you continue to be a bothersome presence here I will use my very real "above average" English skill, reasoning and logic to create a debate that has you looking like the fool you are.

[cambiogris]

Nay, for i find this amusing, insulting you is hardly a chore, it's a pleasure.

I like it because it does not make me feel bad and it does not make me feel bad because you have it coming. Opinions are rarely right or wrong, there are simply that, an opinion. For you to dismiss someone's opinion on the basis they are are younger or less educated is foolhardy. It proves you are not wise, you have already proven you are not smart what's more by finally giving ground on some of your views you have shown a lack of convictions.

Stupid, unlearned, spineless, agitating & a presumptuous. This is you, this is how you have acted. Apologize or leave but don"t continue to defend your actions. As far as I can tell you haven't insulted me yet (doing so it probably beyond your ability, I have a very thick skin) but you have been remarkably rude to the other people is this thread.

Stay in this thread and continue your rebuttals, I will personally tear them apart. I am older than and smarter and if you continue to be a bothersome presence here I will use my very real "above average" English skill, reasoning and logic to create a debate that has you looking like the fool you are.

tl;dr

[Godik7]

tl;dr

O:

[cambiogris]

O:

Yes, that is what I do to pseudo-intellectual morons who write long posts of incoherent, rambling garbage when one or two sentences will do.

e: It's actually the polar opposite of the 4channer stereotype I'm talking about. With the two extremes being exactly what this forum doesn't need.

[Antallion]

It's totally because you're older and smarter and righter than him.

[Godik7]

Yes, that is what I do to pseudo-intellectual morons who write long posts of incoherent, rambling garbage when one or two sentences will do.

e: It's actually the polar opposite of the 4channer stereotype I'm talking about. With the two extremes being exactly what this forum doesn't need.

Please don't have children.

[zz_tophat]

It's a generalization. Younger people can be comparatively clever but in general are far less intelligent because they have not had the necessary life experience and education yet.

e: My observations of those on this forum have yet to stray from the trend. . .

You're juxtaposition is that knowledge and the ability to interpret  it are the same thing, they are not.

Your observations are a joke, there is no way to build an accurate model of someone with no history and no inflection.

[cambiogris]

Please don't have children.

Clearly; it would be a shame for my obviously superior genes to be dropped into the pool. Who would want my good looks or smarts?

[cambiogris]

You're juxtaposition is that knowledge and the ability to interpret  it are the same thing, they are not.

Nope, wrong, sorry. But they do both come with age. Try again.

p.s. you're vs. your

[Grampy]

I have to lol at how Godik and zz are both toning up their language in an attempt to keep up with you ;)

[Godik7]

Clearly; it would be a shame for my obviously superior genes to be dropped into the pool. Who would want my good looks or smarts?

It would be but, your children would claw your eyes out by your attitude.

Even listening to the most relaxing music I have, I still would love to punch you in the face. No ones been able to do that in a long time. :(

[zz_tophat]

Nope, wrong, sorry. But they do both come with age. Try again.

ORLY? I'll have to tell my professor the books are wrong, that intelligence is something learned. That's how we'll fix the school system! We'll give them books that make them more smarter! Because it's not like it's been proven that your intelligence is pretty much determined when your daddy forgets your mommy and no amount of self help programs are going to make you any smarter, that the best you can hope for is increased mental focus.

[zz_tophat]

I have to lol at how Godik and zz are both toning up their language in an attempt to keep up with you ;)

Technically I just relaxed the way I write.