1. You didn't bother to read it you close-minded nut. You can't declare propaganda, your religion spreads it around youth like a virus.
2. It's not, it's that people will blindly defend their faith even when everything points against it.
3. Honestly, you can believe whatever you want, the question is if you're so secure about it, why are you getting upset?
4. Yes, it has. Religion interferes with human advancement all the time. We could be well on our way to curing the most horrible diseases if the religious nutwads would shut the forget up. Not only that, but they try to restrict everyone based on their own morals and religious beliefs. Nothing in the government should have anything to do with religion.
Finally, that makes no sense. I can say anything I want, even if I don't believe it. I'm done arguing, however.
1. I could hardly read it because the pic quality was stuff, but what I did read was a bunch of stuff written from a non religious source. If you want to properly discredit something, use actual material, not just classic quotes from the bible that fit your needs. We all know there are mistakes here and there due to the difficulty of translating Latin to English. Learn Latin and read that Bible and see if it has half the discrepancies of the King James version.
2. Like you are doing in your belief in atheism. Which is faith in itself. Not to God, but to the lack of presence of God. It's still a belief and can be seen as a religion in itself. Still makes you a hypocrite.
3. You assume I'm upset about it. That's your error, much like in how people will believe what they think a form of text states. Which is why they stop believing. Which is why you find fault in the Bible because you don't understand the emotionalism behind it.
4. I agree with Bacon. There is no proof that it's religious people are intentionally withholding our progress. There is proof that the lack of financial resources is what is causing our inability to advance any further because everyone wants more and more money and it's reflecting on the things that are produced in turn. Do you know why medicine is so expensive in the US? Because it takes billions of dollars just to produce it. By the time a working drug is finally put into market, the company is already billions of dollars in debt and they need to make up for it quickly before they go bankrupt. If scientific devices were cheaper, the cost of power to produce the drug or run the equipment were cheaper, that would reflect on the overall cost of the final product. (tl:dr The economy/greed is why we can't advance faster than we are.)
Lyrical G already failed hard to my logic, do you really think you can win against it? Granted, Lyrical G was a punk and a patsy. But your lack of creditable sources isn't cutting it in this argument, which is why I agree that your withdrawl from the argument is a wise move. You won't win it.
