lol, No you loving cunt.
You do not capitalize after a comma. Quit it.
All of these kiddos who spend most of their lives on the computer like VALVe more.
From what Ive Gathered.
In my opinion, VALVe is over rated. Most of their games are the same, and they are all first person shooters.
The company targets these kids who like gun games.
I wish they could make more games like their partners on steam.
They have a really nice engine, Why not put it to use besides a loving FPS?
Huh? Maybe.
You do not capitalize after a comma. Quit it.
The engine is specialized for FPS games. If I recall correctly it's grandfather is the quake or quake 2 or quake 3 I don't remember engine.
Your lack of knowledge in this area is evident by your outlandish expectations, especially considering that the game you seem to support does not even meet them.
Please explain the logic here: making FPS games-only is bad in what respect? How are TF2 and HL2, Portal and L4D, how are they "the same"? Did you know: Most of their "partners" on steam do the same thing. Knowing is half the battle. At this rate your brain cells would be chopped up like field mice under an industrial sized grinder.
Take Ensemble Studios. They made RTS games only, more or less. Most of their games were very similar, even, at least much more similar than Valve's games. However, the company prospered until microsoft raped it in the ass and they overcomplicated AOE 3. They made (very arguably) very good games. Now ask yourself this: are they a bad company because they did not expand out of their specialty? Are their games overrated simply because all of them are RTS games?
Companies that excel in one area are more likely to stay in that area. In larger companies especially, the tried-and-true method is the least risky, so they keep with it.
You also don't seem to understand the amount of resources needed to start an entirely new franchise in an entirely new genre, especially when Valve is running 3-4 projects at once.
As for these "kiddos who spend most of their lives on the computer", I have a few comments. First off and primarily, you are one. Stop trying to avoid it. Secondarily, I have severe doubts that you can be, in any way, older than I am. Third, "the computer" is a definite object, in that you are speaking of one specific computer. Do you have thousands of "kiddos" literally on top of what I assume is your computer?
I break up my argument so your arguably simple yet offensive mind won't try to skim. Redundancy is practiced lightly to reinforce ideas. If I have made a grammar mistake, (which would be your retaliation to my comments on your habit of capitalizing after commas) let me remind you that what I have done is a human error, whereas you seem to have a fixed habit of error.
Also give any one person the ability to have all the hats and give away hats, and suddenly they are no longer worthwhile. When you restrict supply, demand increases. When the supply is too great, demand can decrease.
