Author Topic: Well... in a few days (9-11-02)NEVER FORGET  (Read 12613 times)

But if I am undecided and no one can change my thoughts because I decide to ignore all biased opinions I will also not do anything.
Sitting on the fence is worse than being on the wrong side! You're open to being shot at from both sides. It's worse than trolling.

Fun fact: emotions have saved lives before. A man was pinned under a car and was about to die. His wife came out and felt huge fear, this got her adrenaline pumping allowing her to, temporarily, lift up the car enough for the husband to get out.

Inb4doomonkeyallcapsALLAH!!!1!!

Inb4doomonkeyallcapsALLAH!!!1!!
Why would doomonkey yell GOD in arabic?

It's not really trolling tho because I'm not doing it to hurt people. (That would be useless) I am just expressing my opinion.
Trolling is doing something to get a reaction.
In which, i believe you have.

Inb4doomonkeyallcapsALLAH!!!1!!
Isn't going to happen, since he isn't a loving terrorist, he's just expressing his opinions and point of view. If you guys are going to criticize him for that, go criticize yourselves, since you're doing the exact same thing.

It's people like the ones who called Doomonkey a troll that are the reason the freedom of speech amendment/article/law/whatever is in place.

Trolling and "Freedom of Speech" aren't the same thing.

Inb4doomonkeyallcapsALLAH!!!1!!
lol'd
Fun fact: emotions have saved lives before. A man was pinned under a car and was about to die. His wife came out and felt huge fear, this got her adrenaline pumping allowing her to, temporarily, lift up the car enough for the husband to get out.
Fun fact: I'm pretty sure the guy wouldn't have decided to get under the car if he was a robot with no emotions. Also, I could decide that because a loss in my energy was worth less than a life, then use desperation to do something positive to lift the car.

Trolling and "Freedom of Speech" aren't the same thing.
You seem to have missed the point that he isn't trolling.

lol'dFun fact: I'm pretty sure the guy wouldn't have decided to get under the car if he was a robot with no emotions. Also, I could decide that because a loss in my energy was worth less than a life, then use desperation to do something positive to lift the car.
Well, i give up on this topic.

Fun fact: I'm pretty sure the guy wouldn't have decided to get under the car if he was a robot with no emotions. Also, I could decide that because a loss in my energy was worth less than a life, then use desperation to do something positive to lift the car.
The guy was working on the car, dumbass, that is why he went under there, the jack holding it up broke, pinning him in place while crushing him to death (which sounds extremely painful, I just felt like adding). Also, it isn't humanly possible to see someone you love about to die and think logically. You push your thoughts aside and just react, and most of the time that's the best thing.

Now:
i give up on this topic.

So I heard Badspot was viewing this thread

Also, it isn't humanly possible to see someone you love about to die and think logically.
Um...yes it is. :/

So I heard Badspot was viewing this thread
Damn, let's make a run for it. D:
I bet this is about to get drama-fied.

The guy was working on the car, dumbass, that is why he went under there, the jack holding it up broke, pinning him in place while crushing him to death (which sounds extremely painful, I just felt like adding). Also, it isn't humanly possible to see someone you love about to die and think logically. You push your thoughts aside and just react, and most of the time that's the best thing.

Now:
A robot with no emotions would not show greed and therefor would not need to save money and therefor would have taken a shop to a mechanic to fix it. Or the robot would have (thinking logically) first brown townyzed the jack for faults.

Um...yes it is. :/
The person you love, have lived with for years, and he is about to die. You can sit right next to me, look me in the eyes, and say, "Yes, a person can see a dearly loved one about to die from being crushed by a car by thinking, 'Oh, I'm going to "use desperation" to get my adrenaline flowing so I can lift that car.'"

>:/

A robot with no emotions would not get crushed by a car. Therefore, your argument is invalid.