Author Topic: Well... in a few days (9-11-02)NEVER FORGET  (Read 12579 times)

A robot with no emotions would not get crushed by a car. Therefore, your argument is invalid.
Mine? I think me and Doorman are using "a robot with no emotions" as a human with no emotions. But since that's impossible we call him a robot.

Either way, your argument is still invalid.

A robot with no emotions would not show greed and therefor would not need to save money and therefor would have taken a shop to a mechanic to fix it. Or the robot would have (thinking logically) first brown townyzed the jack for faults.
Why would a robot need a car? He is the frikkin car?

The person you love, have lived with for years, and he is about to die. You can sit right next to me, look me in the eyes, and say, "Yes, a person can see a dearly loved one about to die from being crushed by a car by thinking, 'Oh, I'm going to "use desperation" to get my adrenaline flowing so I can lift that car.'"

>:/
...that wasn't my point.

You said it wasn't humanly possible to think straight when something like this is happening. Well, if you're not a loving idiot who doesn't jump to desperacy at first sight of a major problem, you can. Desperation usually doesn't solve stuff.

Guys, seriously, shut the forget up. It's an expression. A robot has no emotions so it's obviously an "emotionless robot."

...that wasn't my point.

You said it wasn't humanly possible to think straight when something like this is happening. Well, if you're not a loving idiot who doesn't jump to desperacy at first sight of a major problem, you can. Desperation usually doesn't solve stuff.
All it takes is a little common sence to know what the forget I'm talking about.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2009, 11:03:43 PM by Doorman »

Why has the government not rebuild the Twin towers?
Well, they didn't want to rebuild it because it was like a monument.

You do know that it's under construction, and that 7 World Trade Center has been completed for 3 years now, right?

Did you also know that it was private property and the government had no obligation to rebuild or fund it - and didn't - until the original owner gave the lease to the future building to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 2006 because he couldn't get the financial backing for it?

Having your tower blown up by terrorists doesn't mean the government can throw away the law and take your property and build a 1400 foot skyscraper on the land and start renting out space. It'd be different if it was a highway they were building, but it's not.


Am I a jackass if I didn't cry to that?
Depends on your reason.


I agree the past helps protect you from the same mistakes. You just have to make sure it doesn't hold you back.
For example: I can learn how to make sure a second holocaust doesn't happen. But, if I'm too busy mourning the first, I'll accidentally let the second happen.

how do you stop a plane from ramming into a tower randomly chosen by people you never knew were planning such a thing?  I am curious cus i think it may come in handy some time in the future...



Why has the government not rebuild the Twin towers?

Didn't they build (or are going to build) an even taller tower named Freedom Tower or something?


It's awesome and you know it.
I'm sorry sick of myself, I chuckled. :(