My theory

[Meekl]

This is entirely possible.

[Ad Bot]

[Atomshock]

Is it okay to laugh at my own pain and misery?

yes, but others.... I just don't understand whats so damn funny about somebody being seriously hurt...

First of all, I'd like to point out that this is NOT a theory. It has no supporting evidence, and has not been tested. It is a hypothesis.

Second of all, inhumanity is too vague of a term that refers to all humans. Does it mean inhumane actions? Does it mean humans spontaneously not being humans? Does it mean that this is stupid?

Ignorance leads to knowledge by our instinctual curiosity and application of the scientific method.

Insubordination has its pros and cons. Nothing would get change without free actions and thinking, but severe insubordination may lead to harm to the civilization.

Inhumane meaning they treat their kind like stuff
I mean, you don't see dogs killing other dogs for money, OR dogs fighting because they have 2 different opinions

[Tokerovin]

My theory

JEWS DID 911

I officially label you as an anti-semite bastard.

OnTopic: Firstly, don't flatter yourself as you are not the first person to associate the "Three I's" as such.

I believe you are on the right track, but your explanation is much to vague to be a legitimate theory. I give you mad propzizzlez for your enthusiasm and for actually attempting to understand, the inunderstandable.

Good luck with that.

[Sirrus]

Ego is the fountainhead of human progress.

-Ayn Rand.

[Atomshock]

I officially label you as an anti-semite bastard.

OnTopic: Firstly, don't flatter yourself as you are not the first person to associate the "Three I's" as such.

I believe you are on the right track, but your explanation is much to vague to be a legitimate theory. I give you mad propzizzlez for your enthusiasm and for actually attempting to understand, the inunderstandable.

Good luck with that.

I'm not flattering myself, just stating... I am aware that it is much too vague to publisize as a fact, right now, it's just an idea

[Sirrus]

Not to nitpick spelling, but I don't think I want to take my philosophical theories from someone who can't spell publicize.

[Jsk2003]

yes, but others.... I just don't understand whats so damn funny about somebody being seriously hurt...

Inhumane meaning they treat their kind like stuff
I mean, you don't see dogs killing other dogs for money, OR dogs fighting because they have 2 different opinions

It's usually more of that it's funny that the guy basically did it to themselves(racking themselves, messing up and getting bruised or scraped up not severly).

You don't know what dogs are saying to other dogs, how do you know what they're fighting over?

[Atomshock]

It's usually more of that it's funny that the guy basically did it to themselves(racking themselves, messing up and getting bruised or scraped up not severly).

You don't know what dogs are saying to other dogs, how do you know what they're fighting over?

They Fight becuase Of dominince, thats how they were made
dogs don't go around saying "HAHA I forgetED YOUR MOM LAST NIGHT!!!1!"

Not to nitpick spelling, but I don't think I want to take my philosophical theories from someone who can't spell publicize.

Sorry, But you knew what I meant

[Jsk2003]

They Fight becuase Of dominince, thats how they were made
dogs don't go around saying "HAHA I forgetED YOUR MOM LAST NIGHT!!!1!"Sorry, But you knew what I meant

And you think that inhumane things aren't done out of people wanting to feel dominant/powerful/strong/controlling?

[Sirrus]

you knew what I meant

Yeah, not a big deal.

Edit: at the end of the day, I think it's so important that people think about this stuff.

As far as philosophizing goes, I tend to not dwell on human nature itself so much as I think about how stupid most of my generation can be. I'm sure as I grow older I can bring myself to come up with basic principles about how we function as human beings but now I'm more concerned about the individual and how they fit into the larger society.

[Atomshock]

And you think that inhumane things aren't done out of people wanting to feel dominant/powerful/strong/controlling?

Yes, thats my whole point

Yeah, not a big deal.

Edit: at the end of the day, I think it's so important that people think about this stuff.

As far as philosophizing goes, I tend to not dwell on human nature itself so much as I think about how stupid most of my generation can be. I'm sure as I grow older I can bring myself to come up with basic principles about how we function as human beings but now I'm more concerned about the individual and how they fit into the larger society.

Ahmen.

[Inv3rted]

They Fight becuase Of dominince, thats how they were made

Dogs weren't 'made'.

[Atomshock]

Dogs weren't 'made'.

developed, made, revolutionized, whatever.

[Wizard]

First of all, I'd like to point out that this is NOT a theory. It has no supporting evidence, and has not been tested. It is a hypothesis.

Second of all, inhumanity is too vague of a term that refers to all humans. Does it mean inhumane actions? Does it mean humans spontaneously not being humans? Does it mean that this is stupid?

Ignorance leads to knowledge by our instinctual curiosity and application of the scientific method.

Insubordination has its pros and cons. Nothing would get change without free actions and thinking, but severe insubordination may lead to harm to the civilization.

It isn't even a hypothesis because it doesn't make any testable predictions.

[Wedge]

It is intended as neither as well. It's a social theory, a theoretical world view to explore behaviors and interaction through a particular lens. It is not possible to either prove or disprove one, although they can be used to formulate hypothesis which can be tested. For examples, read about symbolic interaction, functionalism and conflict theory. Whitaker's theory explores interaction as acts of insubordination, inhumanity, and ignorance. It sounds somewhat similar to conflict theory.