Author Topic: Dang it, Geometry shouldn't involve this.  (Read 3047 times)

He's not having trouble with the (incredibly easy) triangle postulates. He's talking about if it is possible for infinity > infinity.

Geometry is for squares/PUN

He's not having trouble with the (incredibly easy) triangle postulates. He's talking about if it is possible for infinity > infinity.
I doubt it

Infinity is a concept, I think.  You cannot have "infinity plus one" or "infinity squared," can you?  I thought infinity just described an unlimited amount of something; infinity isn't a number, is it?

Infinity is just a reperesentation.

Or the number eight tipped over and can't get up


Infinity is just a reperesentation.

Or the number eight tipped over and can't get up

I like the latter, but the former makes more sense.

BTW, is that an agreement or a correction?  Because basically 'representation' was implied in my post.

Code: [Select]
public class infinite
{
public float infinity;

public static void main(String argv[])
    {
infinite inf = new infinite();
inf.draw();
}

public infinite()
{
float infinity = 0;
}

public void draw()
{
for(infinity = 0; infinity >= 0; infinity++)
{
System.out.println(infinity + "");
}
}
}
« Last Edit: November 09, 2009, 05:44:40 PM by Nepthan »

For forget sakes, I hated geometry, worst math class I've ever taken, I tried so hard to understand Geo, I really did, but I could never learn. Thank god I'm in Algebra II, my last math class ever. Senior year next year means no maffs for me :D

He's not having trouble with the (incredibly easy) triangle postulates. He's talking about if it is possible for infinity > infinity.
Oh I remember this now, but the explanation is gay. Like most math, everything has a gay answer that usually can be clarified using higher forms of math or theory.



Correct sir.
Because if A^A was what Kalph said, it wouldn't be squared unless A was 2

Yep.

Because if A = 4, A^A would be 44, not 42.

how i lern exponents??