Poll

Which is a more reliable source?

The Bible
35 (18.3%)
Science
140 (73.3%)
Bruce Campbell
16 (8.4%)

Total Members Voted: 191

Author Topic: More reliable source?  (Read 39918 times)

Ever since the women's rights movement, women have been discriminating against man to a point where they now try to show superiority wherever possible and claim injustice whenever a man calls them on their bullstuff. So much for equality. Give someone an inch for their rights and they go a light year. Doesn't matter who you are or what you go for.

That's true, but it's beyond the context of my example.

That's true, but it's beyond the context of my example.
Perhaps, but it was an example based on truth.

That's like me reading Wheel of Time (excuse my less popular example, as it's the only one I'm familiar with that has different morals by any extent) and deciding it was OK for women to discriminate against men, so long as I didn't start believing in the One Power and the Dark One.

This essentially means that it doesn't matter if it's happening, the point of morals is to decide if it's ok that it is.

Also, since the god's son was believed to be seen a long time ago to have had magic powers... Couldn't an alien just come in a ship and they believed it was an angle dropping god's son? Of course, aliens must be very far away... but it could take them thousands and thousands of years to return again.

Limited options I see.
I'll vote science since I'll take anything over the bible.

If I can't see it I don't believes it!

If I can't see it I don't believes it!
So much for the Big Bang, huh?

Don't give me any stuff about how god wrote the bible... The human race was not produced by a god.

Had you bothered to read a single post in this thread you lazy mutt, you would realize I do not believe in a god.

I wouldn't mind religion if it wasn't literally a force holding humanity back. This includes simply taking morals from it. That's like me reading Wheel of Time (excuse my less popular example, as it's the only one I'm familiar with that has different morals by any extent) and deciding it was OK for women to discriminate against men, so long as I didn't start believing in the One Power and the Dark One.

I concur with this statement. People claim that we have moved past biblical morality, and yet we still legislate against policies that are not immoral.

Had you bothered to read a single post in this thread you lazy mutt, you would realize I do not believe in a god.
I lol'd

Secondly, if he did any research, he'd know that man wrote the bible, not god. *shakes head sadly at the lazy mutt*

I lol'd

It's what my dad calls me when I don't do something, lol.

So much for the Big Bang, huh?
The Big Bang already happened so you cannot see it, God is "suppose to be here" but you cannot see him.

The notion "I can't see it therefore you cannot assume it exists" comes from not the literal meaning of 'to see', but rather the concept that rational thinking cannot be accomplished when you assume things without evidence.

The Big Bang already happened so you cannot see it, God is "suppose to be here" but you cannot see him.
Which was my point. He didn't see the big bang, so he doesn't believe it happened. Same can be said for anything that has happened outside of someone's lifespan. He was being way too general about it.

I do not know why people believe their vision. Did you know some people 'hallucinate'?
What if we're the ones seeing the wrong things and they actually see the right things?

Humans could not possibly understand what seems like the simple questions above, let alone understand gods or creation.

I don't find either to be very reliable.

Science laws/theory/whatever constantly changes to the point where you never really know if what we know today is true, as tomorrow it might change to some other belief.

The english Bible translation is most likely not accurate in translation, which makes it un-reliable. I cannot say if the first version of the Bible (that would be Hebrew right?) would be reliable or not, as I have never read it.