Author Topic: 15 -year old girl strangles and kills 9-year old  (Read 4059 times)

Yeah, and MSNBC isn't biased at all. They both have opposite opinions, but both are biased as forget. Fox is not 'fair and balanced.'

wat

I didn't say that. Fox News favors spreading slander to forward their agenda. Censorship was the wrong word, but I don't know where you got the idea I said Fox wanted to shut down video games.



And MSNBC isn't?? You can favor whatever channel you want. both are biased, ALL ARE BIASED. fox is just the least; after all they have to be, its their slogan.

And MSNBC isn't?? You can favor whatever channel you want. both are biased, ALL ARE BIASED. fox is just the least; after all they have to be, its their slogan.
lol
anyway
BACK TO THE SUBJECT
What kind of idiot would kill to know what it feels like, she could just go hunting.

And MSNBC isn't?? You can favor whatever channel you want. both are biased, ALL ARE BIASED. fox is just the least; after all they have to be, its their slogan.

um, Fox is just as biased as MSNBC. The only thing is that they claim not to be. That's the problem. I agree with what they say on MSNBC, but I don't say they aren't biased. Even they say they are biased.

um, Fox is just as biased as MSNBC. The only thing is that they claim not to be. That's the problem. I agree with what they say on MSNBC, but I don't say they aren't biased. Even they say they are biased.

mhmm which is why they have less than 750k ratings. because FOX is not biased handicapped, they averaged about 2.8 million ratings this October (according to Keith Olbermann).

this girl sounds cool, i need to party with her sometime

this girl sounds cool, i need to party with her sometime

you have no respect here gtfo.

mhmm which is why they have less than 750k ratings. because FOX is not biased handicapped, they averaged about 2.8 million ratings this October (according to Keith Olbermann).

wat

Ratings don't mean anything. You're a tool.

mhmm which is why they have less than 750k ratings. because FOX is not biased handicapped, they averaged about 2.8 million ratings this October (according to Keith Olbermann).
SPindle.
give up your argument,
um, Fox is just as biased as MSNBC. The only thing is that they claim not to be. That's the problem. I agree with what they say on MSNBC, but I don't say they aren't biased. Even they say they are biased.
I completely agree

wat

Ratings don't mean anything. You're a tool.

ill see if i can find this somewhere...

about a 1/3 of all msnbc audience also watch FOX. i guess the ratings thing does mean something.....


ill see if i can find this somewhere...

about a 1/3 of all msnbc audience also watch FOX. i guess the ratings thing does mean something.....
it means....?

ill see if i can find this somewhere...

about a 1/3 of all msnbc audience also watch FOX. i guess the ratings thing does mean something.....

um

No, that doesn't mean anything.

Are you handicapped?

um

No, that doesn't mean anything.

Are you handicapped?
He is just defending the real handicaps

it means....?


What it means is a 1/3 of MSNBCs ratings (audience) are split between FOX and MSNBC, they shouldn't count. So not only are they split because the media company is BIASED, they only have a round 500k ratings...

I only watch MSNBC to hear olbermann bitch every night about how he hates FOX. funny how he was a sports anchor over at FOX before he was at MSNBC. Murdoch went on to personally fire olbermann because hes an starfish.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2009, 01:18:26 PM by Spindle »

What does the amount of people watching a particular news station have to do with how biased a station is?