..and that relativity is the 5th.
Right now I was just nerding out with my girlfriend over theoretical physics and all that stuff. I figured out a nifty way to define a cube in up to the 6th dimension in that there would be illustrated coordinate planes of the cube placed in a 3 dimensional axis with reiterations of the cube itself. I thought I was clever but then I thought about it further.
It would be more convenient to place the coordinate planes on top of eachother, because the fact that the end cube and the beginning cube are exactly the same, the change between the cubes measued by the distance between where the coordinate planes exist. I realised then that if you just put all these coordinate planes on a slideshow and flipped through them quickly it could illustrate the change in an object over how many coordinate planes it resides in. Play them quickly enough it would create motion of which is reliant upon time.
Note: we are 3rd dimensional beings, I don't give a forget if you say otherwise.
We cannot see the 4th dimension, we can only see how things change with the 4th dimension (I do understand, however, how this argument could be used to saying we are all 1 dimensional and see things relative to the next dimension, but whoever says this, forget you, I already had my theories crushed enough by this first realisation)
We cannot see the 4th dimension, so we can't see the 5th, but it still exists.
It is the same thing such as, the change in location due to time is velocity, the change in velocity over time is acceleration, the change in acceleration over time is jerk.
With this theory the change in any dimension is relative to the next. The perception of time is changed with relative to the 5th dimension, which unfortunately there is not exactly a term for that is within my vocabular, thus it can be percieved as relativity (the theory that going to a massive object and lowering your perception of time being called relativity works to support my name for this observation)
In my reitterating coordinate plane brown townysis of it, this would be the Y axis in how the coordinate planes move. The Z axis would be the change in relativity through the 6th dimension, which I would like to call hyper-relativity, just because that sounds kick-ass.
You can go infinant dimensions through thsi perception by merely every 3 dimensions, placing them inside a repition of the the pack.
Illustrated, this will create a 3D cubic fractal where each cube has infininant cubes inside it placed inside 3D coordinates themselves.
There woudl be a similar way to define such a view using spherical coordinates as well but it would look more like circles inside eachother for every change in angle.
Same concpet, different expression.
Yeah...
I realise that all of you would think yourselves higher than me or smarter than me because you "knew" this before. But I will bet 90% of you who claim to already know this only heard it from teachers or professors and never actually questioned it. You cannot claim I am stupid just because I questioned something, because that would imply that whoever first came up with such claims was infalliable and all knowing to tell us this. I do not see this as being the case, seeing as all of mankind is flawed.
Those of you who accept this without questioning it could in fact be percieved as less intelligent, because they had not been able to provide proof for such facts. I came to this conclusion on my own accord.
Jus' sayin'.
