1) Way to assume my position into a straw man you can easily knock down!
3/4ths of the statements in that paragraph are simply irrational assumptions, obviously made to be easy to refute, so you can feel better about yourself. Nice work.
2) Any real Christian uses science, and believes in natural selection.
3) While we believe in microevolution by natural selection (which is observed), we do not believe in unobserved macroevolution which true, observational science can't prove whatsoever. You can't say (as all evolutionists do, without reason) that because microevolution is true, macroevolution must also be true. Just because a dog can change into another kind of dog, doesn't mean that dog could change into an entirely different species later on.
4) There is no current or fossil evidence ANYWHERE that supports macroevolutionist beliefs. All "supposed" evidence has been revealed to be falsified, or simply a hoax. Archeopteryx? Falsified. Even current evolutionists claim that Archeopteryx doesn't support the theory. Go ahead, throw your sources at me. In fact, give them to Dr. Kent Hovind, who has had a cash reward of $50,000 up for decades, for one single piece of true evidence support evolution. No one has taken the money.
5) Frankly, it takes much more faith to believe in a hypothesis (or, more truthfully, pure conjecture) which has no proof whatsoever, than to believe in the Bible.
6) So what if your evolution is backed by the majority of so-called "scientists"? The consensus of scientists in history has notoriously turned out to be false most of the time, whether it be behavioral physics as put forth by Aristotle, geocentrism (which was never backed by Protestantism, by the way), or continental drift being REJECTED by the majority of scientists.
7) The obvious alternative theory to evolution is supernatural Creation. Of course it isn't backed by "modern" science.
8) Guess what, the atheistic scientists who created "modern" science gave it a definition excluding any phenomenon such as Creation.
9) I wonder why that is? It becomes even funnier when true science was founded in Christendom, carried on for 300 years by great scientists such as Newton, Kepler, and many, many others.
Obviously, none of your raging arguments hold water. I have a great place in modern society, and right now that appears to be here, refuting you soundly.
Ahahaha..
That was just about the most
pathetic post I've ever seen a creationist make. Let me tell you why every single thing you said isn't true
1) You'll see later it is.
2) The only requirement to being a "real" christian is believing in the Christian god. If you want to start a new religion, be my guest. Please, quote a passage from the bible that, when taken in context, supports evolution.
3) Macroevolution is just a whole bunch of microevolutions. They're exactly the same! Maybe a great dane slowly evolves to have a bigger nose, and this gives it an advantage. Then maybe the nose starts getting in the way, so they grow even taller. And then they need thicker legs to support them. Then maybe they have trouble reaching food, so their noses slowly develop into trunks. They keep microevolving until they are far different from the original dane. At the end of just three seperate microevolutions, we have a 6 foot tall great dane with thick legs and a trunk. Enough to be a new species IMO.
4) Every single fossil ever discovered is evidence for evolution. We can TRACE human evolution BACK to a common ancestor with apes through JUST fossils! Imagine that.
5) So it takes more faith to believe in the scientific method, which uses REAL proof from the OBSERVABLE world to make TESTABLE hypothesis which can be DISPROVED with enough evidence. Christianity takes proof from a BOOK that was supposedly written 2000 years ago, it makes suppositions that are UNTESTABLE and refuse to allow them to be DISPROVEN. Lots more faith. I demonstrated in 4) why you're wrong about how the theory of evolution has no proof. Please learn something and come back.
6) This is the great thing about science, though. It CAN be wrong. This is because it predicts things that are testable, and the scientific community is willing to change, if grudgingly sometimes. If you were to offer the scientific community any real proof against evolution, it might be revised. We already have so much supporting evidence for evo. it is probably never going to be disproved, but you never know. And since when was continental drift not believed? That's a pretty set-in-stone rule about geography, I'd like to see your source.
7) Even if evolution isn't true, we don't need to turn to the supernatural. Evolution is always going to be the leading theory because if you prove it's not true in its current state, it will change to accommodate that. And if we need to turn to the supernatural, why Christianity? Nothing special about it except its popularity.
8) Because Creation involves the supernatural, and furthermore, Christians say god exists outside of time. This sort of unprovable supernatural is not part of science.
9) Hahaha, Greeks, Egyptains etc. etc. were not Christian and made huge leaps in science. Science is not tied into Christianity at all. @Newton example: He was put into
house arrest by the church for pretty much nothing but his science, so that's real nice of you guys too.
I would really like it if you left now.
