Author Topic: A thought about conscience...  (Read 8665 times)

Inv3rted has spoken! Lock this now!

I said the same thing he said two pages ago.  Stop jizzing every time he posts.

Zenthrox, refute the viral DNA traces in the exact same part of the genome in different species.

Also, refute the "junk DNA" that builds up over time being essentially the same in different species.

Also, refute the numerous examples of speciation recorded. Also, refute the myriad of evidence available for the FACT of evolution and the THEORY of evolution by natural selection. There is too much to put in a single post, and to remember at once. That is what you take on when you spew stuff from your Biblically censored mouth.

Don't forget to explain the fossil record, and the overwhelming evidence of the age of the universe by half life dating and the edge of the visible universe. The farthest light in the universe is over 13 billion light years away. Are you suggesting that God created the universe with those photons in the middle of their motion? Then why not say that he created the fossil record just to fool us? Then if he did that, why worship him as an all loving God if he deliberately deceits us?

Zenthrox can be disregarded because he's a creationist. Until you people explain to me how every animal in the fossil record existed at the same exact moment (and refute the actual evidence for evolution, which I'm sure you don't even know about), I am going to say "forget you and have a nice day" every time you open your mouth.

As for Rughugger, you're a massive dolt. Science is not a religion because a religion requires faith. There. Done.
Faith isn't an exclusive to religion. Many scientists have faith or belief that their theories will work, otherwise, why try them in the first place? Science has a lot more faith than you care to admit.

Also, most of the most intelligent people were shunned and made fun of for their beliefs until they eventually were proven right. I'll take this as a step in the right direction. :)

Faith isn't an exclusive to religion. Many scientists have faith or belief that their theories will work, otherwise, why try them in the first place? Science has a lot more faith than you care to admit.

LOL

They don't have FAITH that their theories will work. They have evidence that SUPPORTS that their theories will work. That's what the definition of scientific theory is.

Also, most of the most intelligent people were shunned and made fun of for their beliefs until they eventually were proven right. I'll take this as a step in the right direction. :)

This sounds more like "HURR DURR EVERYONE SEES THE STUPIDITY IN MY COMMENTS BUT ONE DAY I'LL BE SHOWN TO BE RIGHT BECAUSE I DESERVE IT."

Faith isn't an exclusive to religion. Many scientists have faith or belief that their theories will work, otherwise, why try them in the first place? Science has a lot more faith than you care to admit.

Also, most of the most intelligent people were shunned and made fun of for their beliefs until they eventually were proven right. I'll take this as a step in the right direction. :)

No, scientists have evidence that their experiments will work, based on tedious research. The purpose of scientific experiments is to discover new things, faith is not required.

And most intelligent people weren't bus drivers.

Can you guys seriously just shut up?

Found the quote: "But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." - Carl Sagan

Can you guys seriously just shut up?

CENSORSHIP HEIL
« Last Edit: December 23, 2009, 10:56:10 PM by Wizard »


No, just annoyed of all the long lines of text, maybe I should hit the hay.

No, scientists have evidence that their experiments will work, based on tedious research. The purpose of scientific experiments is to discover new things, faith is not required.

And most intelligent people weren't bus drivers.
Evidence gathered after they go through the process of scientific experimentation. Even with all this evidence, can you still conclusively prove things that happened far before human consciousness even existed? Everything that happened later than 2000 years is till up to a lot of debate because there is no way for certain to put together an entire history based off of some cave paintings and a few sparse bones here and there. That's like me saying that Dinosaurs probably ate candy bars because we found a candy wrapper and a few dinosaur bones in close proximity. That is a beginning to scientific theory. It will later be proven wrong, but a lot of things we assumed about dinosaurs have been proven wrong even when we had all this evidence right in front of our noses. Evidence and theory and facts do not make scientific fact. It is the gathering of like-minded people who all collectively believe in one thing to make it into something real for everyone else. Sounds a bit like a religion to me.

Evidence gathered after they go through the process of scientific experimentation. Even with all this evidence, can you still conclusively prove things that happened far before human consciousness even existed? Everything that happened later than 2000 years is till up to a lot of debate because there is no way for certain to put together an entire history based off of some cave paintings and a few sparse bones here and there.

Writing existed before the Bible, you arrogant cunt.

That's like me saying that Dinosaurs probably ate candy bars because we found a candy wrapper and a few dinosaur bones in close proximity. That is a beginning to scientific theory. It will later be proven wrong, but a lot of things we assumed about dinosaurs have been proven wrong even when we had all this evidence right in front of our noses. Evidence and theory and facts do not make scientific fact. It is the gathering of like-minded people who all collectively believe in one thing to make it into something real for everyone else. Sounds a bit like a religion to me.

Google scientific theory. Can you test that dinosaurs had candy wrappers? No? Okay. It's not a theory, you're just handicapped.


I think you're made Inv3rted.

I think you're made Inv3rted.

I'm made of mainly carbon and hydrogen.