Author Topic: Project: Inverted 180 degree fsjal with fwoosh mirrored  (Read 5172 times)

I Fwoosh's supporters should have Fwooshatars. Not meant to be a fad.

derp

The way you pulled down your pants and asked people to look at it gave them the impression of a fad.
You have noones to blame but your self.

The way you pulled down your pants and asked people to look at it gave them the impression of a fad.
You have noones to blame but your self.

???
The fact that we made a topic?  I honestly don't understand this particular metaphor, care to elaborate?

The fact you made a topic for your SUPER SEKRET NO GURLS ALLOWED club/joke.

I honestly don't get it.
This was never meant to be an avatar fad, was it?  In fact, fwoosh has nothing to do with avatars.  Our avatars just have fwoosh in them because we are part of fwoosh.

Correct me if I'm wrong, Wynd.
Wait, is fwoosh a cult?

The fact you made a topic for your SUPER SEKRET NO GURLS ALLOWED club/joke.

Ah.
But where do you get 'SUPER SEKRET' and 'NO GURLS ALLOWED' from?


Not a fad, but phazon IS annoying as hell on the first Metroid Prime until you get the Phazon Suit.

Ah.
But where do you get 'SUPER SEKRET' and 'NO GURLS ALLOWED' from?

Tis but a manner of speaking.
It helps divert attention from a poorly brought up offense and distracts those it is targeted on so they are unable to refute.
Yet I suppose, since I am dealing with you, it is uncalled for.

1) Tis but a manner of speaking.

2) It helps divert attention from a poorly brought up offense and distracts those it is targeted on so they are unable to refute.

3) Yet I suppose, since I am dealing with you, it is uncalled for.

1) Figure of speech.  I understand you here.

2) Time to break it down.  "It helps divert attention from a poorly brought up offense..."  I'm guessing you mean it is a cover-up for something 'bad'?  I'm not understanding you here, but if you think it's a cover-up for something bad you're wrong.  "...distracts those it is targeted on so they are unable to refute."  Do you mean we target certain individuals and pull them in?

3) Poor attempt at an insult.  Do better next time.

If I am wrong, correct me.



Explain so he can understand, then/


Yet again, you misinterpret.
You seem to say that whenever we dissect your arguments. I see three possibilities.
A. You lie about us misinterpreting it, because your argument is terrible.
B. You purposely make it so we won't understand, so you can call us stupid and "win".
C. You're self-contradictory, and say it ways you think we'll understand, while at the same time calling us stupid.