Author Topic: Buying Computer  (Read 2021 times)

Quad cores rock, I should know..

It's decent.  However, if you're heavy on gaming, you might want to improve the graphics card.

It's a quad processor. Multiply 2.5 x4, and then try and say that again.

No, no, no, no. You're an idiot.
The cores don't add up like that.


Needs more RAM is a very old Computer joke, I say it in every Buying Computer thread.

How do you convert quad processing speed into dual?

Not by numbers you can't. And you know this so quit trying to be a smartass.
The fastest existing dual core can't even compete with a 1.5quad even.

Not by numbers you can't. And you know this so quit trying to be a smartass.
The fastest existing dual core can't even compete with a 1.5quad even.
Dayum. Really?

I need to get a quad core then.

Not by numbers you can't. And you know this so quit trying to be a smartass.
The fastest existing dual core can't even compete with a 1.5quad even.

Really depends on how they are competing (IE. what application are they running). I'd still take the Quad core, but not if all it can muster is a sad 1.5 Ghz .


That Graphics card is a no no. I would know, my mom's computer has it, sucks for gaming. But then again, so does my ATI Radeon 3100. :(

Well processing don't need to get much faster anymore when a bitsize is going to remain the same forever.
The technology gets better with multiprocessing, not faster.
Clockspeed don't mean much anymore.

Why?

Workstation GPU. Unless Ephi plans on not running 3-d applications much, it's a bad choice.

Workstation GPU. Unless Ephi plans on not running 3-d applications much, it's a bad choice.
The Gt 220 is NOT a workstation GPU, it is a low end standard desktop GPU.