Author Topic: Xbox faster?  (Read 1947 times)

lol

naw, there are a great share of 8 year old cigarettes on halo3.
Plus, greifers on l4d.


The ps3 couldn't get worse could it?
Well, it did.
The sony online community mostly consists of blacks, and mexicans who cant afford xbox live.
HAHAHAHA LOL, I have a ps3 and I'm white. But I will admit this is completely TRUE.

Have you ever been on XBL?
Ps3 has VERY experienced players. My friend went 125-3 on domination. That's not experienced?

Ps3 has VERY experienced players. My friend went 125-3 on domination. That's not experienced?
That's not a stuffty server?

money filters out a lot of idiots

But the PS3 is more expensive...?


Ps3 has VERY experienced players. My friend went 125-3 on domination. That's not experienced?
So your friend is experienced, playing against a bunch of handicaps?

Because it's better.

That's the stupidest stuff I've ever heard. If you think like that, then why don't you own a gaming computer that would cost over a thousand dollars to make? More money means it's better, right? Then it's time to throw out your stuffty $300 PS3 and get the best loving thing that can play games because it costs more.

That's the stupidest stuff I've ever heard. If you think like that, then why don't you own a gaming computer that would cost over a thousand dollars to make? More money means it's better, right? Then it's time to throw out your stuffty $300 PS3 and get the best loving thing that can play games because it costs more.
But PCs are better.

Anywho, that's not what he meant at all.
He said it's better, not because it costs more, but because it actually has a cost.
Having a cost on something filters out all the people who can't pay for it.

You can't say having an awesome computer will magically filter out all the people with stuff computers, because they're still on the same platform and can still play the same games (if requirements are met) as you.

Well PS3 takes longer to set up everything.
Took me about half an hour tops.

My connection is fine, no lag at all. I don't know what the hell you guys are talking about.


Apparently it is
Saw that ninja edit bro.
But the PS3 is more expensive...?
He's talking about the XBL fee.

Saw that ninja edit bro.
What ninja edit?
I did no ninja edit

Ps3 has VERY experienced players. My friend went 125-3 on domination. That's not experienced?
1 good player =! all players are experienced

That's the stupidest stuff I've ever heard. If you think like that, then why don't you own a gaming computer that would cost over a thousand dollars to make? More money means it's better, right? Then it's time to throw out your stuffty $300 PS3 and get the best loving thing that can play games because it costs more.
You need to take time to think about what I mean.

But PCs are better.

Anywho, that's not what he meant at all.
He said it's better, not because it costs more, but because it actually has a cost.
Having a cost on something filters out all the people who can't pay for it.

You can't say having an awesome computer will magically filter out all the people with stuff computers, because they're still on the same platform and can still play the same games (if requirements are met) as you.
Thank you for understanding instead if being an ignoramus. Xbox basically has no cost at all. And by the way, the thin Ps3 is the one that kinda sucks. Just because it has 120gb doesn't mean it's better. I paid 600 dollars for mine. It seems to me that the newer the Ps3 that people buy, they're the ones who have the (most) problems, not all, (most).