Because in natural love, there's the possibility of a child, changing the risk/benefit scales drastically.
But if you're having recreational love, with birth control, how is it any different than gay love? You could say having love with birth control is unnatural as well, but nobody seems to complain about that.
Where did you start talking about orphans here? Where is this coming from?
There you go conveniently dodging my point again. Adopted children = orphaned. You seem to think that adopted children don't deserve the same rights as other children simply because the people that adopted them happen to be a same love couple.
This gets into premarital love, which is another subject entirely.
No it doesn't. Married couples have "unproductive" love. Gay couples have "unproductive" love. I don't see where you get off saying there is a difference.
Again, this is another subject. (loveual actions) How does this support gay love?
It is not another subject. Stop loving avoiding my points. Straight people are at just a big of risk of STDs as gay people. Being straight doesn't make you impervious to disease.
This goes in my signature.
