Author Topic: Vegitarians.  (Read 4961 times)

« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 11:58:16 AM by Zaran »

Quote from: Zaran's link
What does it mean to sponsor a vegetarian? It means that you have to find someone in your life who's a really big pain in everyone's ass every time you want to go out to eat, and then you commit yourself to eating THREE times the amount of meat you'd normally consume to make up for all the meat that your vegetarian buddy isn't eating. It's that simple! That way, you can reverse the guilt trip that they've been laying on us for years by not only neutralizing their cause, but making it actually worse by eating more animals than would have ever been eaten had they not chosen to become vegetarians!

That is the worst logic I have ever heard. That wouldn't make the vegetarian feel more guilty, that would just make you look like an starfish for trying to force your opinion on someone else.

I know it's supposed to be a joke, but that paragraph just pissed me off.

Lol, that is so awesome. But seriously if we didn't eat cows they wouldn't exist, so someone has to eat them, I am sure the cows would rather have 5 years of life followed by a gruesome death than to not have existed at all, I care about the cows so I eat them! And don't say "dairy cows" still like 90% of cows would be gone without the demand to eat them.

Lol, that is so awesome. But seriously if we didn't eat cows they wouldn't exist, so someone has to eat them, I am sure the cows would rather have 5 years of life followed by a gruesome death than to not have existed at all, I care about the cows so I eat them! And don't say "dairy cows" still like 90% of cows would be gone without the demand to eat them.
the only purpose pigs have in the world is bacon and ham.
same goes for fish.
plants clean our air.
so vegetarians are actually killing the planet

the only purpose pigs have in the world is bacon and ham.
same goes for fish.
plants clean our air.
so vegetarians are actually killing the planet
The funny thing is that plants are raised and harvested in just as "cruel" a manner as any animal has been. But it's all okay because they don't have a face. If I had the time on my hands, I'd point out every eye on a potato (face) and every ear of corn (facial feature, kinda) and show them that they do have faces, they're just conveniently ignoring them like most propagandists do. With that said, here's a little song for the Vegetarians.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov5Jgw_Nwx4

I hate the stuck up vegans who think they are superior over meat eaters. I might be ok with someone over my house if they ask for vegetables instead of meat, but I don't like it if they go 'OMG YOU KILLING ANIMALS!!!!!! YOU GONNA DIE TOO!!!!!". Seriously, I have a few facts that may make vegetarism worse than carnivorism: 1. Humans were born naturally on top of the food chain. That means we have to control the ecosysytem by eating the animals. 2. Plants are living creatures too. If you make too many crops, the soil will become overused with no minerals, and will not be able to spawn any plants which are the base of the ecosystem and which help prevent overheating of the earth by absorbing CO2 3. Its usually costs more to plant a bunch os crops than to just kill an animal, in which they fart methane, which is worse than CO2 and is unabsorbale by plants. This may prove that they are actually slowly destroying the earth.

-snip-

No. The plants we use for food come from farms where it's all controlled. If there's a higher demand for vegetables, they can easily grow more. It's no big deal fertilizing the ground. They pay for fertilizer with the sales of the vegetables they sell anyway. And that pretty much ruins everything else you had to say, which was such a reach anyway.

EDIT: I will add that if we were to eat less animals, it wouldn't mean their population would become uncontrollable because we weren't killing them fast enough. They can always just breed less. Almost all of the food we eat comes from regulated supplies.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 03:55:23 PM by dkamm65 »

No. The plants we use for food come from farms Aka, veggie death camps. where it's all controlled. If you mean by packing the most amount of plants in to an acre possible, talk about crowded living conditions. If there's a higher demand for vegetables, they can easily grow more. True, but the rush of Ethanol is Annoying Orangeing a lot of that land we could use to feed people. It's no big deal fertilizing the ground. Just pull your pants down ad take a crap, it is that simple. They pay for fertilizer with the sales of the vegetables they sell anyway.Farmers don't need to as they have cows who graze the stumps out and crap in the field to fertilize them for the next season. And that pretty much ruins everything else you had to say, which was such a reach anyway.Amidoingitrite?

-snip-

I couldn't tell if you were actually trying to make points or just be funny. -_-

A little of both, actually. The Veggie Death camp comment was a joke. But the rest are facts. I lived in a rural farming area for a while and this was direct observation of what happened while I was there.