Author Topic: Blockland Court  (Read 1366 times)

Blockland Court

Recent cases:
  • Case ID112233  |  Oneck vs. FireFish   [Destruction of Property] (Oneck Guilty: 2-1)



I was security guard there

there was alot of riots


What is this I don't even


Theres no point for this.

The host doesn't need a court to decide if they want to ban someone :/

No one has ever heard of Firefish or Oneck. Drama is not here to settle court cases, and especially not ones in which no details are given besides the fact that property was destroyed. In fact there is no information as to whether admins were involved, who did what, where, and from the looks of it the verdict has already been decided at 2-1 guilty. If you made this topic just to show us that you banned someone for unspecified reasons, good for you, now go gloat somewhere else.



Quote

Public Enemy #1
Fixed

Wanted under charges of mangling a topic post and littering the forums with its corpse.


OBJECTION!

I find that there is no evidence to support your claim, objection overruled.

I find it funny how I was just playing Phoenix Wright earlier today =P

SPANISH INQUISITION

NO ONE EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!

Tom

We do not need experts to question the validity of a law that is already on the books.